Ok, so here is the problem. Coin #1 is graded MS67. Now before everyone freaks out, yes the surfaces are not MS67 quality, they are closer to...
Go big or go home, I like this guess!
I only provide 500px x 500px for my gtg threads and these guys still kill some of my coins with punishing grades.
As an update, I sold this coin for $260 within 24 hours of listing it on eBay.
My thoughts are that the coin looks much better in hand than in my photos which don't at all do justice to the luster. The fingerprint is large...
The obverse is 66, but I think the hit on the eagle's breast keeps it at MS65.
That coin is tremendous and it is fantastic to have a gtg thread with photos of this quality, though I think the large size is going to magnify...
The way this thread went, I feel like dropping the reveal is akin to cropdusting a group of people with an sbd. [IMG]
It figures, the first time I try my new system, I run into a Rattler!
Excellent analysis!
Everytime I gtg of a PL coin, I’m under by one grade. As a consequence, I am now adding 1 grade to my initial impression. My first instinct was...
Well, you have defined my main problem with coin #1 and when you see the assigned grade you will really understand.
Or you could just cast your vote in the poll and spare this poor little Washington your wrath, lol.
Regarding the strike, look at the hair detail and windows and doors of Monticello of coin #1 compared to coin #2. It really isn't close that coin...
C'mon man, it ain't that bad, and I didn't grade it, NGC did.
@brokrken @Collecting Nut @Paddy54 @paddyman98
@Sunflower_Coins @eddiespin @CamaroDMD @Springford CC
@ldhair @messydesk @Skyman @expat
@kSigSteve, @Morgandude11 @ddddd @physics-fan3.14
Shown below are two uncirculated 1956-D Jefferson Nickels. Please vote in the attached poll indicating which coin your prefer and if you feel like...
Separate names with a comma.
