I can't speak for the 'bent and re-flattened' thing at all, but it looks like an attractive, problem free example to me. Great quarter! I'm jealous.
Me too. Sounds neat. Pics please.
What Steve said.
I guess that depends on your definition of 'works'. What was being discussed amounts to conservation methods - tweaking the appearance of a coin...
I don't have any information either, but that is a fantastic medal! Posts like this make me want to start looking into them, but get easily scared...
It means that I'm not an 'error guy,' as in that I don't collect or specialize in errors, or even pretend to know too much about them and the...
By no means an error guy, but looks legitimate.
That is one hell of a rubber band burn. Coin looks legit, though. Josh, please don't advise that someone avoid a coin if you are not familiar with...
Your 1928-A St. Louis $50 was one of 880,500 printed, if my book is correct. I would place value at $70-80. The 1934 is a neat note, and I hoard...
Those are some radical errors!
Yeah, those are awesome.
Looks cleaned, but is retoning nicely. AU Details was my vote as well.
My sales have been good, but have been confined to Victorian jewelry and pocket watches, not coins.
Welcome Mike. Maybe, on the bright side, this can help you into the hobby.
Sorry, Josh, nothing about that Buff looks remotely like a proof. As someone on here would say in the CRH forum, "keep up the hunt." How about...
It's a 1970's reproduction, struck in 22K. 0.9g, so yes, significantly smaller than a small cent. Seller is not dishonest, but god, look at those...
I'm still trying to decide if I want to buy a set or not. I did not buy the gold.
Yep, VF details. Great circ find!
The coin was likely in a fire.
Brian provided lightning fast shipping and excellent service, all at an outstanding price. This is twice I've done business with him and...
Separate names with a comma.
