Found roosevelts: 53S, 61D, 64D (BU) jeffersons: 44P, 45P, 39, pre-1960 (23) lincolns: 5 40s/50s, 1919 (G/VG) and some foreign stuff. first war...
Cool find. I really like the coin as well.
AU50 very nice!
Value around $10? Maybe a little more like $13 or something but not much... and the Canadian thing... that's cold...
Well it's not. It's uncirculated and a very nice example if not for the spots. I would not recommend vinegar. It will ruin the coin. Trust me I...
Arg... seems Ruben is the only one that thinks it is (and he convinced me). :desk:
Sweet find! WTG! Very nice strike too.
Alright. I just checked the HA price guide and I think I can get my money back or make a profit if it comes back 65 or better. What do you think?...
:bigeyes: What are you, a saint? I wouldn't even think of doing that... good to hear though. Way to go! :hail:
I know the picture doesn't show it, but it definitely has them. Here is a little better picture but the light kept making it look like they were...
You may have seen this in one of my other threads a little while back, but I am not sure if I should send it in for grading at NGC. I paid $10 for...
I know more about sports so I voted for that. I really don't care either way; a contest is a contest.
Congrats!
So what was your motivation for cracking it out? I would think you, a "coin pro" of all people, would have the sense to leave it in there if you...
Yeah bad idea to have acetone near a candle lol
Nothing really special, but I was wondering if this stuff is worth holding onto. I went to the bank and got some $2 bills. Found a 1976 serial...
Alright maybe not glue...:) but they probably took an 1897 or 1887 or 187? and sanded off the respective number and welded a 7 from another coin...
I guess, but it looks pretty screwed up around the date.
Good catch. Kind of interesting to see how much people will pay for an obvious counterfeit like that. Someone needs to teach that seller that if...
I have already gotten that bug, it's just I don't really have the money for any much earlier than 60. :eek: I'm hoping to pick up a 1963 proof set...
Separate names with a comma.
