I just consulted my old Photograde and will change my F-VF to VF. Too much wear on the triangle on Monticello to be XF, IMO. It's a decent...
One other comment: Finding one today is pretty amazing.
I would call it F-VF. For those of you who didn't find any in circulation, I would guess you either looked in the wrong place or at the wrong time...
Just my opinion, of course, but I don't think the set is worth completing. I would strip out the few dates with some premium (e.g., the 1921s) and...
It's too late now, of course, but maybe you should have submitted it to NCS for conservation before NGC grading.
I'm still waiting on a package of hammered coins I sent to NGC to be certified. The postmark on the package is May 19. I looked on the NGC site...
I had a blank cent planchet that I found while roll searching eons ago. I think it fetched a pretty decent price when I sold it on eBay, so your...
You'll notice that the original coin that started this thread received exactly 0 bids. I, personally, wouldn't buy it as an MS64+, even with the...
This coin is a goner no matter what you do to it.
63.
I like the 1883-O dollar and think it's way undergraded. Of course, it's not worth all that much even in a 64 holder.
Looks like a nice Indian cent to me. I can see why it "broke your heart."
Buy third-party certified key coins in popular series and numismatic (pre1933) U.S. gold coins in decent grades, and you'll do all right in the...
It's what I call a "spender."
63 or 64 with ugly toning (IMO). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and this beholder doesn't think it's beautiful. I could be wrong, of course.
AU58 according to the PCGS TrueView picture. I guessed 55.
Looks like a typically weak strike on a New Orleans dollar to me.
I recently submitted 18 hammered British coins to NGC. I'll post the results when they come back.
I'm going to be a contrarian and say 65.
63, 63, 61.
Separate names with a comma.
