So some coins certified by the major services are overgraded. Is that news? Kinda wonder about the CAC sticker, though.
61 or 62 and not worth having certified.
I guess I deserved that response, SmokinJoe. Truth be told, what I would do with it is throw it in one of my various stashes of essentially...
If it were mine, I would spend it.
I would buy it only after it had been certified by one of the leading services.
Looks fake to me.
61
I had a part-time mail order coin business for a decade in the late 70s/early 80s. It was a lot of fun and enabled me to write off several trips...
64 and I'm not a big fan of toning. That said, this coin is nicely toned.
XF40, and I wouldn't call it dirty, just toned naturally. Leave it alone is my advice if you're thinking of cleaning it.
I agree with Oldhoopster's comments. When buying key coins that are often faked, go with one of the major certification services (ANACS, NGC, PCGS).
I would sell it. It's a common CC Morgan with a low uncirculated grade. If it's your only 84-CC look for a better one. That's my opinion.
VF30 is my guess.
The obverse looks slightly off center. It's what I would call a "spender," as in spend it.
I kept looking for the word "copy" on it. Should have thought of a Chinese product.
That's a small image of Lincoln in the memorial bearing his name.
The lines in the fasces make it closer to the XF mark. The reason you see lower-value coins in slabs on eBay and elsewhere is that the owner...
Time to learn how to spell numismatics. The word does not contain the letter "e."
When thinking about sending something to a certification service, you need to keep in mind what it would be worth in different grades. For most...
They're such common dates, why bother cleaning them?
Separate names with a comma.
