I’m not a big fan of textile toners. So while that coin may garner monster money, I’d rate it around a 4.6
A phenomenally complete and educational thread. Always enjoy your write ups @johnmilton ! :cool:
Is the Morgan closed? I have a coin ready whenever @ddddd ! :D
Option C : not even close for the other 2. And, I watched all 3 sets of videos from insta. Just my opinion.
The (3) is a counterstamp signifying 3 reales. A shortage of local coinage prompted a division of the Spanish 8 reales into triangular sections...
Can you read? Just because something was named something because of ignorance 300 years ago doesn’t mean its definition is the same today. I said...
You stated unequivocally that it was called oxidation because oxygen was involved. That is false. It’s called oxidation because of electron...
Hopefully 35mm diameter counts as "crown size"? [IMG]
@ddddd : Because in Round 2 we agree to a "personal subjective scoring" not a fixed (anchored to Morgan) schema, can we post some non-Morgans...
That’s a 4.8 for me. Beautiful coin.
:confused::confused: Whatever floats your boat I guess. :confused:
Good grief, 5 figures!? smh
5.0 for me. As others mentioned, the toning breaks are detracting/distracting.
I have 40 boxes of 20.
Yes, I have 40 of them :D
For me the toning on the coin is a 2 - almost 3. I expected the variability of the scores to be quite high on this one. It is not the typical...
OK Doug, sure. Just to remind you.... Direct quotes: CoinTalk member: "Does oxygen always have to be part of the mix in order for a coin to...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
@GDJMSP is retired, maybe you can tutor him. :D
Oxidation does not mean that Oxygen is involved. In chemistry, oxidation means a loss of electrons. This does not always have to involve Oxygen....
Separate names with a comma.
