63 with ugly toning, imo. Probably no one on here will agree with me, which is why I put imo.
I'm not sure what you see that looks iffy. All I see is an "S."
You have 20c there all day.
Mint state, worth not much.
au55, split bands How about a quick bath in a coin dip?
There's way too much detail on the eagle to be a F15, imo.
You might try CAC to see if you can get a rare gold bean!
VF30. I like the look.
63, 62. The second one is really an AU58, but TPGs will call it 62.
63,66
The odd color puts me off. I've never seen an IH cent, or any other small cent, that color.
If that's your worst purchase, you've been remarkably fortunate!
I think you're being unduly suspicious about the coin. I don't see any signs of "enhancement" of details. If you're really concerned, purchase...
Buy a Red Book (A Guide Book of United States Coins) and read it from cover to cover. Be sure it's a recent one (2018 or 2019), and you can get it...
I think it's a good idea to provide guide values.
Looking at it tonight, I'll change my grade to AU50. For some reason, it now looks better than it did the first time I looked at it.
63. Nice if you like toning; awful if you don't. I'm a blast white collector myself.
63
I, personally, don't appreciate the mottled toning. I would have it conserved if it were mine.
XF 40
Separate names with a comma.
