Not bad for $8, but I don't care for the looks of the coin or the weakness of the date.
Very nice! I don't see too many of these issues.
I must say, this is very interesting. No XRF here, or I would be happy to run some tests. I must say, I would suspect that if the debasement were...
Really sad. This thing hasn't just been polished, it's been polished recently.
I prefer my early copper raw, although I have nothing against certified coins in general. Just something about it, I guess. Still, hard to believe...
This.
I want a fish hook! How rare is 'Rare'?
I wonder how the owner of the tintype came to suspect that Billy the Kid was in the photo. For all of these that are around, there must be others...
Perhaps the older coins were cut down to accommodate the new size? Just conjecture, I'm really not sure. Numista states: "Coins dated 1928S, 1929S...
The OP coin was struck over an earlier version of the Finnish 1 Markka, and is not a 'flip over double struck coin', whatever that is. Placement...
If I see a RD cent from the '60s or '70s in circulation, I hang onto it. Why not, right?
They are not issued for circulation, but not what I would call rare. Neat change find, though!
A picture of the reverse would help, but I think this note would come back a NET 10, or maybe even 12.
Wow, that's incredible. I'm glad it's out of the ground and added to the census.
That is a nice clip. Most are not as severe or attractive.
Neat sample slabs! That's a lot of dedication, there.
Personally, I would spend it. And I keep everything. Runs of 3.2 million are large. I only keep notes from runs of 640,000 or less.
Yeah, that '02-O is gorgeous! Wow.
I think I'm with Green on this one. I think it's strike weakness. 63.
I would have called it a VF.
Separate names with a comma.
