Probably a Fine on a good day, but the way that cheek looks, it's not a coin many would love.
It could be the photo, but the color is wrong as we see it. My vote is for a counterfeit, as opposed to an altered date.
In my very early days dabbling at coin dealership, I had a flea market space in Pasadena. An old fella came to my booth and showed me a coin he'd...
It's a great coin for a type set The cleaning is not harsh, like so many you'll find. Quite attractive, also, at least to me. Don't be upset...
Beautiful coin. I can't see why it's not a 67. But I can also see why it's not a FSB. As Maxwell Smart would say...missed by...that much...
Not a woodie, not a proof.
Very nice, especially for a 45.
I don't see how that could have happened just bouncing around in a bag, especially not in that position, which is well protected. It should not...
A solid VF on the obverse, and a strong Fine on the reverse. People consider the wheat lines quite a bit, but the obverse could overrule. I'm...
Whether it is AT or NT is not as important as to whether anyone would consider it attractive enough to buy. ANYONE I know would just say... yuuck!
I looked at several on Heritage. The location of this mint mark seems right, but I'm not totally sure about the size. The ones on Heritage...
I'd need to see a better picture, but from what I see, it doesn't look too bad. It is way better than many scrubbed Busties and other coins of...
The date looks off in the first picture, but OK in the second. It's amazing what camera angles can do.
VF. Not an exciting coin, for the most part.
Bronoholic..I know you... the Dietz reference gave you away. We've chatted a few times at Annapolis. I had a couple of bad shows there, so I've...
A nice 40.
I'm on 66 BN. Excellent strike and nice eye appeal.
I don't think it's real. The "N" in ONE is not weak enough at the bottom, the "LIBERTY" is too sharp for a coin with wear, and, as others have...
I'm sorry I missed that. I've never seen a Sliver Dollar before...
Separate names with a comma.