How about that....
AU-53.
64 DMPL here as well.
65 PL also.
Very nice. It depends to me on luster that might come through and is not visible in the pictures. As we see it here, I'm at MS-66. If there is...
Yeah, well...it's ICG...
The obverse tells me AU-50, but the reverse convinces me to call it a 53.
VF-30.
I'm at 45.
I'm at VF-30. Possible old cleaning.
In the 60's, as I recall, "toning" was a word that wasn't even defined. All silver coins needed to be bright to be desirable.
Looks 65 to me.
From that second photo set, I can see it as a 68.
A "fancy" coin indeed...looks conservatively graded to me. Nice image, BTW...
I can only guess that the coin is way, way, nicer in hand that the picture represents. That scrape at 10:00, if it's as serious as it appears in...
I'm at 63PL. Only that scrape in the field in front of the forehead holds it back from a higher grade.
I'm not convinced it's genuine. The date doesn't look right for a 26-S, and the reverse is better struck than normally seen for that date.
AU-something. Looks way better in the second set of pictures. I'll guess AU-53.
How big a spread between 61, 62, and 63? If it's a small spread, I'd go for it without hesitation. If it's a big spread, I'd try to see if the...
I tend to think it's probably genuine. But with no authentication (slab) and no return policy, I wouldn't touch it for a fraction of the price.
Separate names with a comma.
