Purchases are getting are tougher to fill holes in the set. I have added a few more in the past few months. In the main set I also took out some...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
To add to what gdjmsp said above the grading companies have been slammed lately. Some of these orders have been taking 45 days. It is not like the...
Wow! Amazing score on the dimes and you didnt even a receive a cheap shot from Bynum afterwards!!!! It is a stunning set.
Shane won by default......the coin was priced at $95 at a local show.
1882-s's have some weird looks to them. I know what you mean by being concave. Got a nice mail package today, this should be it for a while....
The 80-S is a 63DMPl, the 1885 is a 64PL, the toner is MS64.
OK here goes... Picked this one up today, paid the price on the sticker as I am not into negotiating. I like the pattern, coin is in a NGC 64...
If you are patient on the copystand you can find great deals.... Is there a coin up? I bought one today I would not mind thoughts on.
Duplicate post, Sorry!
NEWPS from show today: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Bingo.
Makes sense. I was thinking 1888-O, I see those pretty dang nice but your comment above makes sense as I am sure there are some mediocre ones as...
I had not read this, good work. I cringe when people say it is an O so it is weakly struck. ONe intersting note is it the mint mark you can...
Unfortunately probably neither proof or PL
I was surprised to see an 1882-S as a common bag toner. I guess I dont put it in the same group as the others dates mentioned.
Question for you..... where was this part of the die work done? I ask because I see the look more on CC dollars than other dollars.
Interesting thought, I have assumed die polishing since there are so many DMPL's with this look, being they are either fresh dies or freshly polished.
Very typical Morgan Die polish that leaves a halo effect: [IMG]
I like the 2 prior guesses better but since they are taken I'll say 175.
Separate names with a comma.
