I'm envious. That 1810/09 is exceptional.
66 for sure. FSB..I'm on the fence.
I'm on 64. Quite mark-free, but held back by that reverse strike.
Disregarding the cleaning, I see the quarter as an EF-45 and the half as an AU-58. The first picture makes the half look really nice and possibly...
I got one that had my wife's initials once. All three letters.
That's a funny-looking 1918/7-D! ;) But at least it's an affordable version of that variety....
That's a great looking set so far! Some of those dates are very challenging in that grade range. It will be a great quest...
I like the original Hobo nickels. The modern ones, no, not my thing.
Very nice. 66.
I can see a 66, from those pictures. Great luster, few marks, and a great strike on the reverse (Obverse average in that regard, but hey...)....
Some people like woodgrain coins. Others don't. Bottom line is..if you don't like the coin, return it. I'm not a fan of companies using "stock...
Since I buy for resale, I have to think about how my potential buyers will do their evaluations. And I have found over the years that many people...
I'll stand by my opinion. It's not counterfeit. And yes, it's silver.
Low to high: 36, 38-D, 37.
I think the lack of luster is what held it back.
I was about to say 65 not having seen the reveal. Only because of the spread between 65 and 66. It appears to be a true 66 coin, but (as the...
I do wonder, though. If a single one of these had been offered to you at a reasonable price...would you have been tempted? They are pretty darn...
Same mark on the eagle's breast, too.
Just because somebody stamped COPY on the coin because they feared it was counterfeit doesn't mean it actually is counterfeit. It looks genuine...
Great restoration! I'm sure it never crossed your mind at the time, but it would be fun to see before/after picturess.
Separate names with a comma.
