Nice coin, for sure. I've had two or three toned PLs. I tend to take one picture set straight-on to show the mirrors, and a second set from an...
I can see the 62. It would have been higher except for the strike softness.
I'm not sure that acetone will change much. A quick dip and a rinse. An XF coin.
AU-55, perhaps 58. I'd love to be the owner.
My results have been mixed. I tend to watch tracking, and some have gotten to their destination in 2-3 days, others over a week. I just sent a...
Totally fake. The date is not even close to what a genuine one would look like.
I'm wondering how the white vinegar soak, followed by some time in mineral oil, and a gentle drying, would work. Not that I'm speaking from...
AU details, cleaned. Assuming it's genuine.
It's not a coin many collectors would want, due to a bad cleaning. Probably in the $200-$300 range, if you could find a buyer. And that might be...
I'd be happy with either one. But I, too, prefer the top one.
61
The cuts across the bell lines make the FBL close, but not there. Overall 65, though.
Maybe we were correct, and NGC was wrong.....it happens...
I'll show you all the coin when I get it back.
He didn't say it was a bad picture. He said it was a different coin on the reverse than what the obverse picture showed. In a slab. I thought...
I'm on 66 also. Very nice.
64. Tough to say whether PL or not. I won't venture a guess on that.
A potential buyer had sent a message, asking if my pictures were of the actual coin, or of some stock photos. Of course I said they were of the...
Separate names with a comma.
