VF35. I'm basing this on the eagle's feathers.
62
64 FH.
I agree with dwhiz. After seeing what a nice looking coin you had, I then noticed all the rim nicks. Unfortunately, I then couldn't "unnotice" them.
That's one of the worst looking undamaged Morgans I've ever seen. Get your money back!
Mine, too. Also, an AU or better 1889-CC Morgan dollar to upgrade my F15. Also, a 1927-D Saint, but you can delete the word "quite."
AU50
XF45 is my guess.
I had a part-time mail order coin/stamp business for 10 years from the late 70s to the mid 80s. Believe it or not, I made a profit that I paid...
62 or 63. Wonderful strike but lots of chatter.
The ones by Aleksey Saburov are fantastic, and I find it impossible to select the one I like the most. Popeye? Willie? The old man with the bike?...
I just noticed the date in 2016 when I responded to this before. Obviously, I thought it was worth more than 1c.
Surely a 1926-D, even in a low grade, is worth more than 1c.
I started collecting before 1957, but I CANNOT RE-MEMBER exactly when.
I'm wondering why someone would submit a coin like this to a TPG. It's a horror, and I'm with all the other posters who indicated they wouldn't...
63
As they say, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. To my ancient eyes, that coin is a horror.
Normal 1892-S that has XF40 detail but has been harshly cleaned.
XF, harshly cleaned.
Separate names with a comma.