Cool. I think it was a great buy.
I like the price and it is really pretty. But O/S? I've never heard of that in a 81. I know there are O/Os for that year. I wonder if it is a...
63+
35
65
It is really pretty and would be proud to have it. But noway is it 66.
It’s so cheap... why not always use fresh?
I am not an errors guy, but I do find the missing edge lettering kinda fun. I have a Washington. I’ve been considering putting a set together...
62/63 PL
Two separate recent purchases... but still under $50 combined. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[IMG] should have made this one like the baseball and moon concave shapes :)
AU50. One of the 3 Morgans that I dont have. That sucker is expensive.
64 and really pretty
18 secs on a screaming 125MB/s wifi
I’m pretty sure it is simply the number of people who have placed the item to their watchlist.
I’m going a different route.... AU58.
Yeah, I just went through the list. Nothing even remotely close. Except the 92/92 Columbus.
I just picked up a 1992 Columbus Quincentenary 2 coin set (for a lovely price of $24). And I have the classic 1892 Columbus Expo Quadricentennial...
PF68
Seems like that Morgan is 63-ish. MS63 for an 1890 is not very expensive. You can find tons of graded ones from PCGS and NGC for under $75.
Separate names with a comma.