The recognized dbl die is a strong Class I, with a counter-clockwise spread on all the peripheral lettering and little doubling on the other...
Not a smart post. In spite of all the bias, I think ICG is as good as anyone one else in the slabbing business. There's too many out there who...
Sorry-neither Die #1, #2, or #3. No hub doubling whatsoever.
And here is a controversial but to me a very convincing Class III doubled die, the 1914 4/3 Die #1 Buffalo nickel. [ATTACH]
No DOUBLE dies, that is. Here's the reverse of the coin above-two totally different doubled dies, the obverse is a Class I doubled die and the...
I don't have any doubled dies. I do, however, have many doubled dies. Here's one- The 1934 doubled die obverse. [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
There are a couple of value with restored dates-I've seen the 1916/16 sell for around a grand and the 18/17-D for around $100. I wouldn't want...
It think it's a late die state MS63. The lines you mention are due to the advanced state of the dies.
Nice! It could easily make XF40 IMO.
I'll go with the flow-'09-S VDB.
Many of the 1916 [IMG] doubled die nickels also show additional machine doubling, such as this one. The "doubling" on the nose is machine doubling.
PCGS gets my vote.
"Nobody views ICG as a legitimate grading service." I do.
I'm sure there's at least one bidiot that will bid on it.
"I call it machine doubling and folks know what I mean. Both terms are correct. Same with double die and doubled die. Both terms are correct....
It's a die clash if you're talking about the anomaly at E Pluribus Unum. This is very common with Buffalos but, that aside, that's quite a...
Not the variety.
PCGS for me.
Separate names with a comma.
