Yeah, but you didn't know what a VAM was :p
I think by law they have to be destroyed
I know of others, but the VAM 2D/2E are REALLY rare. After spending some time with it I agree it doesn't have a chance at 64, but 62 seems too low...
Here's some more photos of the VAM itself [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The cartwheel is kind of hard to miss on this one. Here's another photo just for fun. You can see the die scratch going from the R to the S in...
But look at that die gouge though, and the five clash marks on the reverse
It just sold for over $1300, I feel bad for the buyer
Now I'm thinking it's either a LDS 2D or EDS 2E [ATTACH] [ATTACH] c [ATTACH]
I think it's an 1882 CC VAM 2D, but not sure if it's the 2E. I've been looking for one of these for a while! Anyone think it could go...
It matches, but the most glaring thing is the reverse. It's a '79 reverse and the mintmark is all wrong.
Is it just me?...
Silver's challenging the 50 month average again. If it hold above $20.35 it could break out.
[ATTACH]
5. 1878 CC [ATTACH] [ATTACH] 6.1884 CC [ATTACH] [ATTACH] 7. 1883 CC [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Getting ready to send some stuff to NGC, feel free to guess their grades and we'll see how close they get. Please forgive the white balance...
I think the criteria is reflectivity past 12 inches, where DMPL is past 6 inches.
Good eye, thanks!
It's a good one, I use it all the time!
Separate names with a comma.
