I, too, think I detect wear on both the obverse and the high points of the eagle so nice AU58.
65. I'm not a big fan of toning, but your coin is nice.
Y'all must not have seen my last post: PCGS threw the dice and came up 55!
I'm changing my guess to AU55. However, I peeked. I agree with the grade b/c of the obvious wear on the reverse.
It's a PCGS MS65.
I just took pictures of my example that you might like to see.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
AU58, wear on right breast. Maybe FH.
64PL
I was referring to the one I knew little or nothing about grading, but I take your point.
It's painfully obvious that I know little or nothing about grading Feuchtwanger cents. I can see I should have kept my opinion to myself.
I, too, would have given it a 55 b/c of the wear on Liberty's curls.
it's = it is
VF, cleaned
The first two pics make the coin look terrible, which is why I said 61. It looks a lot better in the slab. 64 better? That's another question.
61
F15
The color makes me think it's been cleaned. Where's the patina that should be on a coin with enough circulation to make it VF?
I would grade it VG8 with environmental damage.
Sure wish I was 70 again. Here's a 1920 cent I found recently while walking in the parking area of a park near my house. I have a feeling that the...
The 1877 looks genuine to me. Look at the "N" in ONE. It's weak, as it should be. Also, I think the grade on it is closer to VF than F. I'm not a...
Separate names with a comma.
