Genuine. $200 wasn't awful, but $150 would've been better.
Polished all to hell.
If they're all problem free Good, then that's nothing to scoff at. The 1877 is 500, the 09-S is 200, the 08-S is 40, the 1864-L, 69, 70, 71, 72...
MS64... pretty scuffed up. [ATTACH]
AU details counterfeit.
Should be F12 and VF20, but I'm guessing they're both F15.
XF40 and scary good fake.
Do it!!!
You should start an Unofficial series, Jack, where we grade your collection of counterfeits! :happy:
Your 1858 Flying Eagle Cent is the FS-901 Low Leaves variety. :)
The 9 and the doubling at the top of the 8 digit.
66. I usually like to see some toning on a 66, but this one has the luster and lack of marks.
64. One mark in a focal area away from a 65
Easy 66 rd
https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-difficulties-of-coin-collecting-on-a-budget.282954/ Looks like I gifted you a free 1922 Weak D!
Just keep in mind that dipping circulated coins is a no-no most of the time. Sometimes you can get good results with mid to high AU coins,...
Same treatment as the obverse. Pretty common for there to be better luster on the reverse of these coins, since there is less open fields to pick...
Both are F15 or VF20. The 1831 is the large letters reverse, slightly more rare.
Just normal circulation areas combined with the lighting.
This one was a little risky, but the eye appeal (IMO) was severely affected by the black splotchy toning on the obverse. It will still straight...
Separate names with a comma.
