Since the title says "Dollar", I have to post multiple pictures to equal $1 worth of Morgan design: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'm not very astute in gold, but does it look puttied? Something just doesn't look right to me about the color in the fields; [ATTACH]
Just bought one. I use a Canon DSLR with a Mamiya 120mm Macro for my full coin shots, but have never been able to get the finite details to image...
TBH, I wouldn't blame him after reading the responses to his post. He's new (aka "unfamiliar") with CT's common practices (ie; photos of coins...
350
Not to encourage the reincarnation of necro-threads, but why is there ZERO info about these double-dots? You'd think with all the hoopla back in...
@johnmilton I think your '92 has a good shot at 65 by today's standards. From your images, I can't see why it wouldn't. Nice coins, and I love the...
The Columbian is a very difficult coin to grade in my opinion. What looks like rub on the cheek and hair is almost always just a relatively weak...
[ATTACH]
Those are horrendous, and I like coins with toning, colorful or not.
This: [ATTACH]
That is not a scratch, it's a toning anomaly. Probably something prevented it from toning in that area (much like how a fingerprint affects...
About 4 years ago I bought 2 mint sets; '60-D and '63-D just because. Package came, and I stuck it in a drawer without even opening it, and then...
Hmm... I see that as a low AU at best, but nowhere near a 65.
How are they made?
Your photo above, or seller's?
How about photos taking any TPG labels out?
@Charles Ruge - did you buy the coin based on the True View, or were there other photos provided by the selling store?
That's simply impressive!
I think the hits on the cheek keep it from 66
Separate names with a comma.
