Some new ones: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
This one just car in, great for the year when it comes to mirror and contrast. [IMG]
The #43 set is hardly a bragging set. The registry set is meaningless, the only bragging right is a complete set of morgans.
What is interesting in my little world of collecting Morgan DMPL's, I know about 8 of the top 12 registry holders, all good guys, low ego and help...
My table will be setup for photos inside the show, drop off your coins, shop, come back for your coins. I will be at table 933 doing the imaging...
Cash is definitely king as mentioned. I am ready for the show, I will be at table 933 for the duration.
It looks like they take them at an angle or have uneven lights, not helping things.
Here are some of my thoughts, this is not my series at all, never owned one. 1. no real opinion. 2. cleaned and retuned. 3. scratched 4....
I think most of those don't have a chance. Why don't you tell us which ones you think would slab? Then we can help you see the issues.
I go PCGS 1st, Then NGC then ANACS. I do think the newer NGC holders are worse than the older ones from about 2 years ago. The plastic seems...
Yea and if you are going to follow anyone's opinion, find someone besides Doug! Sorry Doug, couldn't resist.
They are crap.
I voted 65 but thought it to me it was a 64.
I cant imagine the 2nd one grading with that color. Once in hand take great care to verify these are proofs and first sign of doubt return them.
That would be me. See the sig line below, I have table 933 at FUN.
Picked this up, not the most exciting. [IMG] [IMG]
No about the only place you can see this is the 1878 7/8 weak vs strong as the weak were polished down. The numbers are pretty even though. There...
It has to die with the way the die and planchets were made. Think about all the Morgans made how many hundred million? PCGS has graded about...
That angle could hide all sorts of flaws.
Separate names with a comma.
