:hilarious::hilarious::hilarious: "Messed With" should be an official descriptor for the head scratchers.
I can't see it as anything but UNC Details Cleaned/Polished. It's too shiny.
65
So you're looking for someone who agrees with you, no matter what the coin says?
This FE has very unusual wear. On the obverse, the breast feathers are in the 50 range, but the tailfeathers are in the 35 range. "OF AMERICA"...
Ummm.... I'll buy every Morgan available at $10 each. Cash money, babee!
All those "obvious" signs, and yet, nobody guessed 'Details' of any type.
The photos really aren't very good, but I'll give it a go. XF45, AU50 at best.
I agree it looks 'polished' (or something) more than what typically gets the 'cleaned' designation. The obverse surface looks (as you say)...
I'm amazed I got a Morgan GTG correct!
I'm sure we'll get a new member in a week or so asking if we think it's real.... :banghead:
63PL
I'd like to see those 63's. This coin has fewer dings then my 65, and a stellar strike. Take a look at the sail on the right; does your 63 strike...
Thanks. I wasn't sure of the exact amount, but *thought* it was close to tolerances. Oops. :oops:
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Note who graded the coin.
Personally, I'd keep it. But that's me.
Just 4? I'm at 10. You need to catch up! :D
IMO, the superb strike and eye-popping toning were enough to bypass the minor hits.
With that enlarged/enhanced pic of the reverse by @ksparrow I still revert back to my original statement about the denticles. I know there was a...
Incredibly well struck. This is a jaw dropper, and I can't see it being anything but a 67 Probably sold for $2-3K, and worth it.
Separate names with a comma.
