Sms were only 65-67. So no on SMS. There were a few 64s made also but thats a special case and all are accounted for.
I believe the marks you are referring to were ment to guide the cutting of the sheets of currency.
I believe he is referring to the very slightly misaligned die. Normal on dimes. Not worth more than a dime.
That is coin counter damage from being rolled. Not an error.
It looks to be a token of some sort.
Not an error. It was ground down.
Likely 1977 to 82. Lower relief than 66-70, wrong hub type for 71-76.
Well its from after 1966.
Sure looks like a small date.
100$ loomis box of nickels found AU 1950-d. Thought it was unc, but a bit too much chatter on shoulder. Still 5 rolls to go. Nothing else worth...
Found a 1995-d ddo roll hunting. Had been looking for one for a while.
All im seeing there is damage on a very common nickel. No error.
Looks like it to me. Good find! Been looking for one for a while.
Yeah, i agree, only worth a quarter.
No go for me too. Has the look.
I will have to disagree. This did not happen at the mint.
We are talking about the same coin right? Thats not a lamination, cud, or die break of any kind. Just a severly damaged coin.
Looks to be a deep gouge. Worth face value.
Had me for a second there untill i saw who posted it! Lol thought it was going to be another 69s
The hole in victorias head would tend to remove any premium that would be attached to this coin unless it was an extremely rare coin.
Separate names with a comma.
