A picture of the other side as well as size and weight. Your original picture gives us no idea of scale and only shows one side. I would think...
There is nowhere near enough information given to answer your question.
I agree with @paddyman98 it looks like a brockage to me, but I know very little about errors
I think that an interesting fact about nickels that people don’t realize and has completely escaped this discussion is this: Nickels are made of...
your coin is just damaged not an error
They go with the 1928-A I picked up two weeks ago. Paid $10 for that one as well.
Ron, you realize this thread is Washington Quarters, right? There is no 1949-S Washington Quarter
but mine were $10 each...
another awesome post john, but I wanted to give some feedback as I also believe that the accurate information is out there, but not largely...
Winner!!! Thank you so much. It's obvious when you look at them.
$20 for the pair
And here’s the 1950-S [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here’s the 1950-D: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here’s the 1950: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Today’s purchase from the shop where I work. [ATTACH]
Hey all, I picked these up today for a bargain price and wondered why the series changed. The signatures are the same, and I can’t immediately see...
It also occurred to me shortly after I had posted that maybe the books were a gift in 2017, hence it makes perfect sense to post in this thread
You realize that this is the thread from the year before last, right???
It’s hard to say without seeing the coin in hand, but yes, it looks correct. The 32-D and S both look like the mint mark is sitting in a...
Actually, it looks correct
Separate names with a comma.
