Wow, now that I retook these, it hit me how right you all were regarding the lighting. Thanks. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I thought the pics were a bit bright, but didn't realize they were "severely overlit." I'll try again.
[ATTACH]
Never been so happy to buy a severely damaged coin... HM-2 variety, earlier die state. Very scarce. [ATTACH]
This is only $50?!? Looks like a $400+ coin to me... [ATTACH]
XF details cleaned it my guess. Maybe AU.
Metal flow when it was struck.
PCGS & CAC MS64+ [ATTACH]
Oh. When you wrote, "I paid $399 for the coins the OP listed," I thought you meant literally... as in you bought his coins. Sorry for my confusion.
What are you talking about? I'm quoting the OP and his purchase of the 10 coin roll.
I mean, you paid $56/coin, which is MS64 slabbed money for common dates. You tell me how you did.
I understand that the graders overlooked the edges, but standards aside... do you agree they are more marked up due to the lower strike pressure...
This makes sense to me.
Interesting. Perhaps the toning is hiding more marks on the observes and reverses than I can pick up.
I just don't know why else the rims would be so marked up when the obverses and reverses are so pristine. These were minted with a screw press,...
If you click on the pics, and focus in on the rims, there are tiny ticks and marks on all 3 of the coins. Some worse than others. Despite this,...
There are 10 PCGS MS66 1833 dimes, according to CoinFacts. And I own 3 of them - all new discoveries. :eek::woot:
Separate names with a comma.