Just curious... wouldn't it behoove the developers to have fed the AI enough at the point of publishing to get at least basic results correct? Why...
makes sense... mine have separate order numbers
I use an app called coin-o-scope. It works with varying degrees of success
I dunno... I tried several coins and a note and it wasn't close. Not even once
what makes you think that they'll ship these together?
the finish on the SMS coins is completely different. In fact, it creates a flat luster which is present on all of the OPs coins. The regular...
The OPs coins are SMS coins. All of them. A 2009 Circulation strike looks like any regular nickel. Ther SMS coins are almost all MS67 and better....
where are the 64 Denvers?
This came from a SMS that I had purchased: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
looks like a proof to me
That coin is from the 225th anniversary Enhanced Uncirculated set
Autocorrect made me say things I did not Nintendo :D
Do a little basic research on the Coinage Act of 1965 and you will understand that 1964 dated coins were being struck into 1966.
No conspiracy, just history. In 1965 the US Mint was producing clad dimes, but at the same time was still producing silver dimes as well. 1965...
Except in this case, which would be bad information as a 1965 dime with no mint mark was probably NOT struck at Philadelphia. I understand your...
A scam would require a deception of some sort. The TPGs are clear as to what their designation means. If someone is still dumb enough to think...
Not quite. That is 1979. The 81 Type I and II are somewhat different. The Type I is the same as the 79 Type II mintmark and the 1980 proof...
Get it right, Doug! It's: Teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and drink beer all day!!!
And one last token: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I have been researching these for my job and I thought that the crowd at CT would enjoy them as well. Please comment if you have any knowledge to...
Separate names with a comma.
