Imo it appears to be zinc rot not a mint error.
I'm not a 72 year collector but it appears to be MD to me. Jmo
It appears to be a plating blister not an R Jmo.
Imo it appears to be damaged not any type of error.
It appears to be DDD to me but I have DDD on the brain today. Lol
It looks more like DDD to me but then again I'm no expert.
Well no matter what the out come is that's a nice looking coin for 111 years old.jmo
Well I'm not seeing it don't know how it would be possible, but I have starred at a coin for hours and saw Elvis Presley. (Just Saying). Lol
PMD (post mint damage) not a mint error.jmo
You might want to check your scale as most on here will say no pic it didn't happen. Lol
Honestly based on your photos it appears to be environmental damage. Jmo
I wish you the best on that I really do.
Well I hate to tell you if you get into this business for the money you have a rude awakening coming to you. Jmo Those cents you posted would be a...
[ATTACH] I believe your coin is a close AM look at the FG it should be closer to Memorial Building on the wide AM.jmo But let see what other's...
Those photos are blurry to my eye's I can see where your talking about maybe a die chip (maybe), let's see what other's think with better eye's.
I believe your coin based on the pics you provided is DDD ( die deterioration doubling) Imo I don't believe this one would qualify as a double ear.
Maybe it's me but I don't see any pics.lol
Based on the pics you provided it appears to be a circulated business strike coin, it appears to have DDD ( die deterioration doubling) but that...
It looks like a WAM congrats.
I agree with @paddyman98 DDD worthless but it does have MAD some people collect those.
Separate names with a comma.