Sorry, I believe 40% Halves were minted 1965-1970 Inclusive.
That sums it up.
Too funny!:D No, I think it's a bad deal for him if I pay *only* $40000! It's more like six figures with that gem..:D
Lol! Ingredients: Lead, germs, and a lot of history. Today's special at 1.99 plus tax. :D
Yes, the 8 in the date is suspicious and the whole coin looks 'flat.'
Lovely coin. I can see history in that coin!
IF it's a mint state, I would walk away from that coin...I choose eye appeal over grade.
Yes, especially the other one(1926-S).
64. An abrasion of the reverse and some marks on cheek.
Well it could be a VF Details Damaged, which is a choice. There's something going on with the date.
First one, I think is UNC details Damaged or otherwise MS-65. Second one, is a strong 66 and it IS worth a Cac sticker.
I am thinking a very nice AU-58. I do see the slightest bit of wear of the cheek. But still a great coin!:D
Yup! http://www.amazon.com/1955-Luxembourg-Letzeburg-Franc-Coin/dp/B0080S5DZQ
Click on 'upload file' and search for pics in your computer. It's very easy to do on an ipad or an ipod.
Ms- 65.
They are truly fantastic, lovely coins kanga!!
But my point is that Rolex and Gucci and all of those things are just watches and bags, however a fake COIN, seen from a non-numismatist's view,...
so how what's its,collector's value? Anyways I'm not gonna spend them...4 of them are consecutive and I like the back design.
In 1(!!!!) roll:[ATTACH] 1943-D and a 1964-D
So is Ebay not permitting sales of coins 'graded' by NGA? If that's the case, crack it out and sell it in a 2 by 2 cardboard flip. Anyways, the...
Separate names with a comma.