1952 d. With OMM

I have a 1952 d with a Omm you can see it at the bottom of the D and the point from the 5 can anyone help me out with this coin.......

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

This is the only OMM listed on variety vista and it doesn't seem to match yours
http://varietyvista.com/02a LC RPMs Vol 1/OMMs 1952D.htm

There's a bunch of RPM's listed however and perhaps one matches yours.
http://varietyvista.com/02a LC RPMs Vol 1/RPMs 1952D.htm

Honestly, I don't see anything besides wear. Could be wrong though

 

These are the 3 styles of MM used by Denver in 1952
http://varietyvista.com/01a LC Doubled Dies Vol 1/Denver Mintmark Styles.htm

 

I'm not seeing it looks normal to me.

 

I looked at it variety vista looks like it to me....here's a good close up

 

That lighting its hard to see but the other close up sure looks like it matches to.me

 

Please cite source http

 

Hi Bradford - the position of the mm is the first thing I notice. When that doesn’t match then looking for makers is pointless. Using both will help you dial in on attribution.

 

not the same coin

 

Would like reverse photo, please.

 

It is the same coin......but ill get some good pics front and back

 

View attachment 1264200 View attachment 1264201 View attachment 1264200 View attachment 1264201

 

Your pictures will need to be clearer than that to be able to see the mintmark... Take you phone camera, and go to manual settings. click on the button that changes the focus, and put the focus at the lowest setting. Then move your camera up or down to make the picture as clear as possible. Then either find something you can put it on that's the same height as where you were holding it, or hold it as steady as you can and take a picture. Then crop it. Also, zoom in on the date/mm as close as you can so you can see how it will turn out.

 

A clearer picture would help. The closeup you posted looks over pixelated and it’s making positioning harder to pinpoint. The VV image of the mm looks to be further south to me. Also rotating the image to make it level will help. I usually do that on my phone (along with cropping) before I send it to my laptop for final editing.

 

According to you're pic's I do not see it either, sorry.

 

The reverse is too damaged to see markers. The photo comparison does not strengthen your case, colorization only adds to the confusion and conclusion, IMO. The latter photos of the MM are too blurry and poorly lighted (glare) to observe detail. Based upon this summary, I don't have an opinion. Thanks for the additional photos.