About 30 years ago I wanted a 'real' Vetranio. I find it upsetting now as I did then how many dealers peddle coins of Constantius II 'issued by Vetranio' as if they were 'real' Vetranios because they share the types and branch mint. In my book, coins of a person need to have the name or at least the portrait of the person. There are coins inscribed with the name of Vetranio. I found a very worn but clear Vetranio AE2 with clear legends and the best of his reverses HOC SIGNO VICTOR ERIS Which was the then current way of saying By this sign, you will conquer. I wish I could show you a photo of that coin but I made a mistake and overwrote that file when I got the higher grade coin below. I was thrilled with the upgrade and quickly sold the lower grade coin seeing no reason to keep both. My thrill with the above coin disappeared when I discovered it was a fake. There are quite a few of these on the fake reporting pages although there does seem to be some question on exactly how they were made. I believe most often seen is 'lost wax' casting. They are dangerous fakes. My seller immediately refunded the coin when I returned it so I was back to having no Vetranio. A year or so later I found another one in my price bracket but it was the 'other' (read: "lesser") reverse: CONCORDIA MILITVM. I do find it interesting that this type has two Chi-Rhos regularly more clear than the single one on the HOC SIGNO coin but I did still consider it a lesser coin than the one I wanted. Today the post office came through with rapid and safe delivery of the coin I wanted to replace the one I had foolishly sold and replaced with the fake. It was the lesser of two offered in last week's CNG Electronic sale (473, lot 366) https://auctions.cngcoins.com/lots/...nalis-245mm-482-g-6h-siscia-mint-3rd-officina The better was lot 367. I was the only bidder on the one I won but there were 7 bids on the other coin. https://auctions.cngcoins.com/lots/...onalis-24mm-509-g-6h-siscia-mint-5th-officina This illustrates several points I consider interesting. My coin has considerable flatness on the reverse which explains its lack of popularity. The 'better' coin selling for well over double mine had better reverse figures but not as clear legend. I wanted the coin for that legend. If you want a bargain coin, consider bidding on the lesser of the offerings in a big sale like CNG. Many of their bidders would not think of taking the lesser coin so they bid only on the better one. Had they both been available for what I paid, I still would have selected the one I got. Your opinions may differ. In fact, there was one other thing here that affected my choice. The other coin was a .ESIS* just like the fake. Mine was a gamma (.GSIS.). The better coin is not one of the known fakes die matched to the one I returned BUT 'once bitten, twice shy'. I am not in the market for further Vetranio coins now (I hope) unless these turn out to be fakes, too. The fakes were very good, IMHO, and I would never have suspected the coin were it not for the multiple identical copies in the fake databases. I do not know these coins so I have to trust the seller. Post your Vetranios.
Hi Doug, you've got my sympathy where adventures with fakes are involved. ...No, frankly too embarrassing to get into. ...One reason I'm shy of ancients, at least online. With medievals, you don't get the same tradition of faking, and the ones there are (thank you, notably from eastern Europe, via ebay) are generally much easier to spot. Ironically or not, the engraving styles end up being uniform enough (thank you, mostly punches) to be effectively unmistakable. Meantime, Congratulations on the Vetranio! Your emphasis on the integrity of the legends is especially resonant.
Congrats on the real Vetranio, nice coin and interesting as you point out that the nicer legend is on your coin. I don't have a coin with VETRANIO in the legend, but I do have one of Constantius II that Sear describes as: "This type was issued under the stop-gap emperor, Vetranio who opposed Magnentius' eastern advances before abdicating in favor of Constantius II on 25 December AD 350. The remarkable reverse legend "In this sign you will be the victor", with its clear allusion to Constantine's vision before his victory over Maxentius in AD 312, provides firm evidence of Vetranio's loyalty to Constantius" (RC&TV p.187). This one appealed to me for the link to this time period, the obverse portrait and the ragged flan (that others might see as detracting). Constantius II Æ Centenionalis, Siscia, AD 350 Struck under Vetranio Obv: DN CONSTANTIVS P F AVG, pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust right, A behind, * in front Size: 5.64g, 22.5mm Rev: HOC SIGNO VICTOR ERIS, Constantius standing left, in military attire, holding labarum and spear, being crowned by Victory; A in left field, •ASIS• in exergue
Vetranio. 350 AD. Æ Centenionalis (22mm). Siscia mint, 2nd officina. Obv: D N VETRA NIO P F AVG, laureate, draped, and cuirassed bust right; A to left. Rev: CONCORDIA MILITVM, Vetranio, in military attire, standing left, holding a labarum, ornamented with a Christogram, in each hand; star above; A in left field; •BSIS✴ in exergue. RIC VIII 281; LRBC 1168; Hunter –.
One of the only emperor of these times who died of natural cause. Constantius II spared his life and gave him a peaceful retirement. He enjoyed it for 6 years. Vetranio AE2 Thessalonica 24mm 5.03g RIC 126a
I'm a bit ashamed to admit that I'd never heard of Vetranio until now. I just finished reading the short wiki page on him. Pretty interesting. Great coins all, especially @dougsmit and @Sulla80 with the depictions of Victory!
An entertaining and cautionary tale, @dougsmit ! I have only one of this emperor. The portrait makes him look criminal: Vetranio AD 350 Roman AE maiorina; 4.77 g, 24mm Siscia, AD 350 Obv: D N VETRA-NIO P F AVG, laureate, draped, and cuirassed bust right; A to left Rev: CONCORDIA MILITVM, Vetranio standing left, holding labarum in each hand; star above; A to left; in exergue: •ΓSIS✷ Refs: RIC 281; LRBC 1168; Cohen 1; RCV 18903.
I like that new one, Doug. Congrats. I don't have a HOC SIGNO, but here's mine with Vetranio's name misspelled VERTANIO, something that seemed to have happened occasionally at Thessalonica. (Embarrassing fact: You won yours just 6 days and already have it photographed and written up. Mine was also from CNG, but 6 years ago, and I still haven't gotten around to photographing it. ) VETRANIO AE2. 4.93g, 24mm. Thessalonica mint, AD 350 AD. RIC VIII Thessalonica 126 var. (obv. legend); Hirsch 258, lot 2707; CNG inv. no. 161220. O: D N VERTAN-IO (sic!) P F AVG, laureate, draped, and cuirassed bust right. R: VIRTVS EXERCITVM, Emperor standing left, wearing military attire, holding labarum and shield; TSA in exergue.
VETRANIO RI VETRANIO AE3 17mm 1.78g Obv: DN VETRA - NIO PF AVG; laureate, draped cuirassed bust r. REV: GLORIA RO - MANORVM; Emperor standing facing holding standard and spear. EXE: gamma SIS Siscia mint. REF: RIC VIII Siscia 294, scarce, 350AD. Ex: @seth77
here's a Vetranio without a beard...he looks more like Constantius II Vetranio A.D. 350 22x24mm 3.5gm D N VETRANIO P F AVG; laureate, draped & cuirassed bust right. CONCORDIA MILITVM; Vetranio standing facing, holding labarum inscribed with Chi-Rho in each hand, star above, A in left field, B in right. In ex. •TS∆• RIC VIII Thessalonica 132
I think your bidding strategy was very wise, and congrats on snagging the HOC SIGNO type. I got mine many years ago when I visited the CNG shop, with stars in my eyes: It's a dreaded •ESIS*!
Congratulations @dougsmit! And if even a veteran like yourself gets tricked by a fake, what hope is there for us? And auctions don't make sense. I think we conclude that. It indeed gives us the opportunity to go for a bargain, or coin that otherwise would be out of reach. Example, my Petillius Capitolinus coin, posted yesterday, is weakly struck. It must have scared of others, because that's the reason I could grab it
I’m glad someone finally dared to speak about their Vetranio experience. I had almost surpressed mine, although it wasn’t very traumatic at all: I just went into Numisma coin shop in Oslo, looked at the coins and thought «there’s one I don’t have», and bought it for 80$. This was early in my coin collecting career, so I had no awareness of what I was buying at all. Just knew it was Vetranio. Just like the bidders on Dougs auction, I went for a good portrait, while letters and reverse are pretty shabby. I have identified it as RCV 18903, Siscia mint. It looks a lot like the one @Severus Alexander posted, but I’m not able to make out the mintmark well enough to see if it’s ESIS or GSIS or whatever. So, while Dougs Vetranio experience is one of planning, awareness and learning, mine is probably the exact opposite... But good to get a reminder that it might be an idea to try to get some of the crud off the reverse legend, and get some brighter pics. Congrats to Doug with the new coin!
My modest Vetranio: (Bronze) AE3 Thessalonica mint, A.D. 350 Obv: D N VETRAN-IO P F AVG Rev: VIRTVS EXERCITVM - Emperor, standing, facing left, holding labarum (standard with Chi-Rho) and resting hand on shield TESA in exergue RIC 138 18x20mm, 1.4g A similar situation exists for Aureolus. I have seen many coins with the image and name of Postumus on the obverse listed as "minted by Aureolus." Wildwinds even has a page of them: http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/aureolus/t.html The big difference is that genuine coins of Vetranio actually exist and, with a little patience, are relatively easy to acquire. As far as I know, there are no uncontested coins in the name of Aureolus. Perhaps that's why so many collectors (myself included) are more willing to call a coin in the name of Postumus an "Aureolus."
The fakes of LRBs can be scary, but I'm glad you were able to get a genuine one! Here is my Vetranio, genuine as far as I am able to tell.
Nice portrait! Not a die match, but surely the same engraver. It's a good bet it's the same officina, then.