Octavian & Rhoemetalces I./ Shall I return it?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Steven Michael Gardner, Jul 17, 2020.

  1. Steven Michael Gardner

    Steven Michael Gardner Well-Known Member

    I thought this was a nice coin I found at auction, this was the photo I bought from,
    however I received it and noticed a glint of shiny silver metal where the highlights are in the photos, now this can't be I thought, as bronze will not shine like silver...
    whats going on with this coin, is this simply a rust covered steel imitation?
    3511-Octavian-as-Augustus.jpg

    RARE TYPE Rhoemetalkes I. is the only not-roman person appear on a coin together with Augustus. 4.1gm. 17.5mm Obverse: Bare head bust of Augustus right. KAIΣAΡOΣ ΣEBAΣTOY Legend in Greek Reverse: diademed Bust of Rhoemetalkes I. right, client king of Thrace, BAΣIΛEΩΣ ΡOIMHTAΛKOY Legend in Greek.
    Thrace; RPC 1718, SNGCop 1192, BMC 7-9, Moushmov 5782, Jurukova 200.
     
    Andres2, Johndakerftw, Bing and 3 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dltsrq

    dltsrq Grumpy Old Man

    Brass sometimes appears silvery. Looks fine to me.
     
  4. Herodotus

    Herodotus Well-Known Member

    The base metal of most ancient coins not made of silver or gold(or a combination of) is copper, or copper mixed with other metals to make an alloy.

    Bronze is an alloy of primarily copper and tin. Although, other trace metals can also (and usually) make up the total composition of ancient coins such as: nickel and aluminum.

    Copper is also mixed with zinc to create brass.

    Most ancient coins are referred to as AE as there exact composition wasn't a set recipe copied by all across the board.

    Both copper and tin are shiny metals until they are exposed to oxygen and they begin to oxide(aka tarnishing).

    New bronze tubing:
    [​IMG]


    There is a good chance that your coin was either aggressively cleaned or the patina may have been scraped/damaged when it was getting shipped to you if improperly packed.

    In other words...

    While somewhat corroded, your coin is fine.
     
  5. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    I have several that have been silver washed and some that have been silver plated. It was done a lot back then. I am no where near an expert, but, I think it could be actual silver. I'd keep it but try to confirm the silver.
     
  6. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Like others, I see nothing amiss. Remember brass is part zinc, and provincial mints weren't always experts in mixing them. I see that phenomenon all of the time.

    A plated steel fake? That would be 1000 rarer than a real coin.I have never heard of a steel fake ancient coin.
     
  7. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    I agree with the others not to worry. Good luck
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  8. Finn235

    Finn235 Well-Known Member

    Not the best condition, but that's one of the better style busts I've seen of Rhoemetalkes. As for the color, maybe it's been given a coat of wax? It has that typical waxed look to it.
     
  9. octavius

    octavius Well-Known Member

    coin looks A-OK to me.
     
  10. PeteB

    PeteB Well-Known Member

    Your coin looks OK, to me. A related coin:
    AugRhoemetalPythodoris.jpg
    KINGS of THRACE. Rhoemetalces I & Pythodoris, with Augustus. Circa 11 BC-12 AD. Æ (25mm, 10.43 gm, 5h). Obv: Jugate heads of Rhoemetalces and his queen Pythodoris right. Some drapery on Pythodoris. Rev: Bare head of Augustus right. Youroukova 204; RPC I 1711.
     
  11. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Attributing these coins can be tricky.

    Here's a similar coin, but it's unclear who is on the coin because experts disagree. Augustus or Tiberius? Rhoemetalkes I or his grandson, Rhoemetalkes II? Pythodoris, the wife of Rhoemetalkes I or some other Pythodoris?

    [​IMG]
    Kings of Thrace under Roman rule.
    AE 24 mm, 6.88 g.
    Obv: ΑΥΤΟΚΡΑΤΟ[ΡΟΣ ΚΑΙΣΑΡΟΣ ΣΕΒΑΣ]ΤΟΥ, bare head of Tiberius, right.
    Rev: ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩ[Σ ΡΟΙΜΗΤΑΛΚΟΥ], jugate bust of Rhoemetalkes II, diademed, and queen (Pythodoris?), right.
    Refs: RPC I, 1721; BMC 3.209,23; Sear GI 5405; Youroukova 201; Forrer 207.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2020
    Johndakerftw and Bing like this.
  12. PeteB

    PeteB Well-Known Member

    I'll go with RPC. No doubts mentioned there.
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
  13. Herodotus

    Herodotus Well-Known Member

    My understanding is that ΣΕΒΑΣΤΟΥ(SEBASTOS) is the Greek representation of Augustus.

    Now of course, subsequent IMPERATORs('ΑΥΤΟΚΡΑΤΟΡΟΣ' in your above legend) adopted the use of Augustus in their titles. However, I've tended to notice that coins portraying Tiberius w/ Greek legends often utilize 'ΤΙΒΕΡΙ(0)Σ', or a variation of.

    That stated, one would then look to the portrait to help assign it to a specific emperor. With provincials, this may prove more difficult as portrait styles may vary somewhat the further away from Rome one may be. Your coin looks like Augustus(Octavian) to me -- If I were to have to choose between the two. Tiberius is often portrayed as having a beak-shaped nose and beady eyes.

    Am I absolutely 100% sure it's Augustus? No.. but I have a high-level confidence that it is, and I'm comfortable enough to omit Tiberius from consideration for my own opinion; using the above criteria as descriptors.

    Another thing to consider is that Tiberius was known to not have been very interested in coinage, at least as it pertained to depicting his likeness. Even though his rule was one of the longest among emperors(w/ my understanding being that only Augustus and Pius ruled longer prior to the Tetrarchy), this is the reason why there isn't as much variety in the types of coinage minted during the rule of Tiberius featuring his portrait.

    Look at Trajan for example. He was among the set of emperors that saw the value of using the mintage of coinage as an effective propaganda tool. While Trajan's rule lasted for a few less years than that of Tiberius, there is a multitude of variety in his coinage vs. Tiberius.

    https://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/tiberius/i.html

    https://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/trajan/i.html
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page