United States: silver Capped Bust quarter, 1831

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by lordmarcovan, Jun 26, 2020.

?

How interesting/appealing do you find this coin, whether or not you're an expert? (1=worst, 10=best)

  1. 10

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 9

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 8

    6 vote(s)
    42.9%
  4. 7

    1 vote(s)
    7.1%
  5. 6

    3 vote(s)
    21.4%
  6. 5

    1 vote(s)
    7.1%
  7. 4

    2 vote(s)
    14.3%
  8. 3

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. 2

    1 vote(s)
    7.1%
  10. 1

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    United States: silver Capped Bust quarter, 1831
    [​IMG]
    Obverse: bust of Liberty left, wearing a Phrygian cap.
    Reverse: bald eagle, wings spread, clutching an olive branch and bundle of 13 arrows in its talons, as on the Great Seal of the United States.
    Issuer: United States of America.
    Specifications: .892 fine silver, 6.74 g, 24.3 mm. Reeded edge. Small Letters variety. Mintage: 398,000.
    Grade: PCGS VF25; cert #84066638.
    Reference: PCGS-5348, Numista-30781, Browning-2 (R2).
    Provenance: ex-Liberty Coin Service, Lansing, Michigan, USA, 19 May 2020.
    Notes: In 1831, the Capped Bust quarter underwent a revision of John Reich's original 1815 design. The diameter was reduced slightly and Lady Liberty was given a more slender profile in the redesign by William Kneass. The E PLURIBUS UNUM motto was removed from the reverse.
    Comments: This is a wholesome circulated example with medium-grey original toning.
    Additional images

    017700S
     
    tibor and Penny Luster like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

  4. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I gave it a 6, primarily because of the rim bumps/dings on the reverse. Not a problem for me in the grading of the coin but this is a subjective ask of how much we like the coin. And while I like it, it got knocked down from 8 to a 6 because of the rim dings and also because it doesn't have quite as much CircCam contrast as I prefer.
     
    johnmilton and lordmarcovan like this.
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    At first I thought you were reacting to the presence of the slab insert grippers ("prongs") in the photos, but upon closer examination I see the little rim chatter you're referring to. Now that it has been brought to my attention, I must say that those sort of subtle marks are definitely not enough to distract me, in this particular case. I didn't even notice they were there until you pointed them out! As to the CircCam contrast, well, sure, that would be nice if it were stronger, but I do think this is a nice subtle CircCam.

    I voted "8" in the poll.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page