Galba Servius Sulpicius Galba was born on December 24, 3 BC in Terracina, Italy to a well-connected and very wealthy family. His paternal grandfather was Servius Sulpicius Galba, praetor in 54 BC and his maternal grandfather was politician Quintus Lutatius Catulus. In his youth, Galba was remarked by both Augustus and Tiberius to have great abilities and destined to be important. He became a Consul in 33 AD, followed by a military command in Upper Germany, and then a proconsul in Africa. Just prior to becoming imperator, he was the governor of Hispania Tarraconensis (Spain). Suetonius describes his Hispania tenure as “…variable and inconsistent. At first he was vigorous and energetic… but he gradually changed to sloth and inaction, not to give Nero any cause for jealousy, and as he used to say himself, because no one could be forced to render an account for doing nothing.” Galba would become the first emperor in the so-called “Year of Four Emperors” (which was 69 AD, although he became emperor in 68 AD). Late in the reign of Nero, three of Nero’s governors revolted: Galba (in Spain); Vindex (in Gaul); and Clodius Macer (in North Africa). The rebellions in Gaul and North Africa were ineffective, but Galba’s revolt was successful, resulting in his being proclaimed emperor in April 68, and becoming Augustus in June 68 following Nero’s semi-suicide. Galba then took his armies and marched toward Rome. Galba entered the city, was proclaimed emperor by the Senate, and set about immediately to restore Rome’s finances, but his lack of political acumen and penurious nature proved to be his downfall. He refused to pay the Praetorian guards the donative (i.e., bribe) promised to them by Galba’s representative for their support. He also heavily taxed the provinces who refused to support him. He incensed the people by approving few citizenships, foregoing the normal pomp and display the people enjoyed and routinely sentenced accused to death without a trial. After only seven months of rule, on January 1, 69, two legions refused to support Galba and promoted Vitellius. Sensing the tide turning against him and toward civil war, Galba tried to suppress this unrest by adopting L. Calpurnius Piso as his heir, but that triggered Otho, one of Galba’s earliest supporters, to respond. Otho marched on Rome and on January 15 was the first of what would be rival forces to arrive, slaying both Galba and Piso, becoming the second of four emperors that would rule during 69. Side Note: The entire civil war of 68 – 69 AD was mostly one of greed and power. The Roman citizens were curiously detached, uninvolved in the machinations among the generals other than being occasionally victimized. Citizens believed the participants didn’t merit being fought over, and thought the war was generally without any real substance. The ancient historian Tacitus describes the atmosphere as: “Close by the fighting stood the people of Rome, like the audience at a show, cheering and clapping this side or that in turns as if this were a mock battle in the arena. Whenever one side gave way, men would hide in ships or take refuge in some great house. They were then dragged out and killed at the instance of the mob, who gained most of the loot, for the soldiers were bent on bloodshed and massacre, and the booty fell to the crowd.” About the Coins Despite his short tenure, Galba’s coinage is described by Vagi as “… among the most complex and diverse in the entire Roman series. Not only did he strike as Imperator (which includes many of the anonymous “civil war coinages,” notably including those on which his facial features are assimilated in the portrait of Divus Augustus), but he also struck as emperor. He coined in all three metals… [his] reverse types are varied, and many of them are historical in content. Most of his coinage as Imperator is propagandistic in nature…” My sestertius of Galba might be the most artistic 12 Caesars portrait in my collection, and is even more striking in hand than the pictures illustrates. Let’s see those Galbas! Next: Otho
A lovely collection of coin @IdesOfMarch01. I like the portrait on the denarius best. I really like the denarii of Galba. I have only 2, but I am always on the lookout for his rarer denarii. Galba AR denarius, VF, Rome mint, ( 3.512g, 19.0mm, 180o), Nov 68 - Jan 69 A.D.; elegant style, light toning on nice surfaces, high-points flatly struck, Obv: IMP SER GALBACAESAR AVG, laureate head right; Rev: HISPANIA (counterclockwise starting on left), Hispania advancing left, draped, poppy and two stalks of grain in extended right hand, round shield and two transverse spears in left hand; RIC I 193 (R2), BMCRE I 16, RSC II 83, BnF III 89, Hunter I 1 var. (no CAESAR, Aug - Oct 68), SRCV I (2000) 2103 var. (same) Ex: the Jyrki Muona Collection; Ex: Forum Ancient Coins Coin depicted in the Wildwinds.com database. Paid 720.00 USD GALBA, A.D. 68-69. AR Denarius (3.38 gms), Rome Mint, ca. A.D. July 68-January 69.. Obv: "IMP SER GALBA CAESAR AVG PM" Laureate bust of Galba facing right; Rev:: Virtus standing facing, holding parazonium upwards and leaning on vertical spear. NGC Ch F, Strike: 5/5 Surface: 4/5. RIC-236 Provenance: From the Graywood Collection. Coin depicted in the Wildwinds.com database. Paid: 258.00 USD
Very nice presentation, write up, and gorgeous coinage. I agree, I particularly like the Sestertius. My Galbas: My Sestertius has been man-handled... RI Galba AE Sestertius SPQR - O.B - CIV.SER in Wreath I captured a Quinarius as I enjoy the denomination, and they are usually a little more difficult to find: RI GALBA AR Quinarius Lugdunum mint laureate r Victory globe stdng left 15mm 1.5g SCARCE
The portraiture on those bronzes are terrific IOM, I only have two Galba an Imperial As and Alexandrian Tet.
Love the bronzes & gold! Galba, (68 - 69 A.D.) AR Tetradrachm, 13.6, 23mm, 12h; Egypt: Alexandria, AD 68. Obv.: ΛOY KAIΣ ΣOYΛΠ ΓAΛBA [-]; Laureate head right, LA in right field. Rev.: AΛEΞAN - ΔPEA; Draped bust of Alexandria right wearing elephant headdress. Reference: Dattari 298; RPC I, 5326 From the Aethelred Collection Galba (68 - 69 A.D.) AR Tetradrachm SYRIA, Seleucis and Pieria. Antioch O: AYTOKPATWP GALBA C KAICAP CEBACTOC, bare head right. R: Eagle standing left, wreath in beak, on two laurel branches; palm to left, ETOYC B (date) below. Antioch Mint 14.4g 26mm RPC I 4198; Prieur 100; SNG Copenhagen 163a
Thanks, it looked a little worse when I bought it as I have removed some of the red oxide adhesion on the obverse.
I'm really enjoying the writeups you have created, Ides. You have a good balance of historical detail and the "personal touch." That the coins are outstanding examples is a characteristic of your approach. Great stuff, this. Servius Sulpicius Galba (68-69) (BMCRE 8; RSC 55; RIC 4) Minted at Rome IMP SER GALBA CAESAR AVG bare bust of Galba, laureate, facing r. The facial features on this coin are not common to his coins generally, but are known on other examples. The prominent nose with the disfiguring bulb just below the supraorbital ridge (prominent eyebrow) and strongly defined zygomatic arch (cheekbone) gives a crude, almost bestial appearance to the emperor's visage. A respondent in another thread commented on a similar image on a coin of orphew (see above), "I wonder if it has to do with the fact that Galba only ruled for 7 months. Perhaps the engravers at the various mints [sic] simply didn't have enough time and practice to settle into a more-or-less homogeneous style. ... One sees a hint of Nero in Galba's busts, and I can even imagine the engravers being told, 'Well he looks like Nero, but with a smaller head and a larger, aquiline nose.'" Since there are examples with a similar, though less prominent bulb on the nose, and some without anything like it altogether, on other coins, it would seem that there was indeed some confusion about just how to represent the actual feature. DIVA AVGVSTA Livia draped, standing left, holding patera in r. hand and long scepter in left On the use of Livia for the reverse, Mattingly commented thusly: "Livia, consecrated by Claudius, is represented as a divine being with scepter and patera. Suetonius tells us that Livia had assisted Galba in his youthful career...." to which he appends the quotation in Latin to the effect that: Augusta Livia is noteworthy above all on account of her gracious life valued by many who speak in testimony of her in death. (my loose translation). About the image he adds an interesting footnote: The patera, which belongs strictly to the priest or priestess, is commonly transferred to the object of worship." This observation is in keeping with the role of ritual enactment of myth as a drama in which the temple functionaries stand in for the mythological figures. At any rate, it is the gracious generosity of Livia toward Galba that is being celebrated in and by this reverse.
I love that dupondius @IdesOfMarch01 (the others aren't bad either ) My only galba is the weak part of my 12 Caesars set even though it's quite scarce Galba, As minted in Rome AD 68 SER GALBA IMP CAESAR AVG PON M TR PPP, Laureate head of Galba right Rome seated left, SC in field 10,60 gr Ref : Cohen #182 Q
Great coins all Galba AE25 Diobol Alexandria, Egypt. Obv. Laur. head left. Rev. Bust of Isis right. Dattari 320. Year 2 = 68/69 AD.
Great writeup... and your coins put most museum collections to shame! I have a Sestertius of a similar type, albeit not nearly as flawless as yours: SER GALBA IMP CAESAR AVG TR P, laureate and draped bust of Galba right LIBERTAS PVBLICA S C,Libertas standing left, holding pileus in extended right hand and vertical sceptre at her side in left. Sestertius, Rome October 68 37.06 mm / 25.33 gr RIC 388; BMCRE 69-70; CBN 194; Cohen 112; Kraay (“The Aes Coinage of Galba”, ANS NNM 133) p. 88, 200 (obv. die A148, rev. die unlisted).
I love the variety of coins posted!! Naturally, I 'like' IOM's incredible coins and the wonderful write-ups---that sestertius is stunning!!! Mu sole 'budget' example from an old practice photo:
Here is one of my 2 denarii. One has been posted twice before in others threads, so I will pass it. Here is the other: RIC I 167