Meet the new one pound coin..

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Loong Siew, Jun 25, 2017.

  1. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    United Kingdom. 2017. Nations of the crown.

    Silver piedfort pound. Mintage: 4000.

    This coin marks the introduction of the new 12 sided design of the pound to replace the decades old round pound. The coin introduces state of the art anti counterfeiting features which included a holographic £ symbol when viewed at the angle and many other undisclosed secret marks. A significant part of the reason for the new design was due to the royal mint's estimation that almost 3% of all circulated pound coins are counterfeits. The Royal mint described the anti counterfiet features as top-secret, state of the art which requires a machine to detect. The design features the fifth portrait of the Queen and a design of four emblems of the nation's of the crown namely the English Rose, Welsh leek, Scottish thistle and Irish shamrock, design which was won by a teenager during a national competition held to select the design for this significant coin.
    20170416_223844.png
     
    chascat, jj00, pragmatic and 7 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Y'know, I actually like that. That is a modern coin I would enjoy having. It is quite handsome.
     
    Oxford Punter and Loong Siew like this.
  4. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    Actually the one pound coin is already in mass circulation. Effective September or October, the original round pound is no longer legal tender
     
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I was referring to that silver proof piedfort in the OP, of course.
     
    Loong Siew likes this.
  6. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    Haha.. Yeah.. it was quickly sold out. But you can still find a number of resellers online
     
    pragmatic likes this.
  7. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    I do enjoy the modern decimal coins. Why the choice of the piedfort?

    Incidentally, here is an interesting website that records the counterfeit pounds. There are actually some interesting designs in there:
    http://www.thefakepoundcoindatabase.co.uk/

    Such as this fake £2 coin...
    IMG_1785.JPG
     
    Loong Siew likes this.
  8. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    Piedfort silver was due to it being silver, heavier and smaller mintage. I got it when it was still on preorder by the Royal mint.

    Counterfeits were so rampant that it prompted this new issue. But it is quiet interesting a design with 12 sides.
     
    FitzNigel likes this.
  9. pragmatic

    pragmatic Well-Known Member

    I wanna ask coin fans, their deep interest in proof versions.
    they look beautiful, shiny and charming indeed. but there are some issues about proof coins that concern me:

    1-It seems central banks and mint companies know how to get more money; more proof, more money.

    2-What is the pleasure in having a coin trapped and imprisoned inside a plastic seal. The real pleasure I find in coins, is to grab it in my hand (even if sweaty lol) I wouldn't bother, as long as it quenches my desires :D
    besides, the more the coin is rusty, scratched, circulated, and what have ya, the more genuine it looks!! proof coins sound and look very artificial and it is just a means of ripping collectors off their pockets.

    3-I have no money to buy proof coins :D
    well, even if i could afford proof, I would go for circulated coins, something that had been in the hands of Tom, Dick and Harry made a currency out of it, folks!:cigar:
     
    Loong Siew likes this.
  10. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    1. Sure, if you're buying current issues, you'll be paying high markups for proof coins sometimes. But after they're a bit older and have had time for the market to settle, maybe not always so much.
    2. One learns to live with plastic. True, it does remove the element of touch, and I certainly understand people wanting to touch their coins, but of course handling is not good for many of the coins - certainly not proofs, anyway. Coins that have had a long time to build up a "skin" of patina are a different matter.
    3. Not all proof coins are expensive.
    Think about it this way - a proof coin is how a coin is supposed to look, in its most perfect incarnation. It's a different creature from a business strike that was struck to circulate.

    Think of it like a soldier. When he's on parade, he's in his best, immaculate dress uniform. When he's on the battlefield, he's wearing dirty fatigues. See? Proofs are the dress uniform. Business strikes are the battle fatigues. Both have their place.

    Some prefer business strikes, and circulated coins. Some like pristine proofs.

    Me, I like both. :)

    As to the plastic holder thing, I do most of my examination of my coins on the computer screen, while the coins themselves are locked in a bank box. That's quite different from the way I collected, 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago. But I don't think there is any "right" or "wrong" answer there. To each his own, and let everyone collect the way he or she gets the most happiness from it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2017
    Loong Siew, FitzNigel and pragmatic like this.
  11. pragmatic

    pragmatic Well-Known Member

    well-said :)
    being cheap sometimes is relative. for a US or European citizen a $40 proof coin is surely cheap :)

    but for someone from the middle east, $40 is a lot of money to pay :-/ sadly is.

    I wanna ask another question, how long a proof coin would stay proof?
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2017
    Kentucky likes this.
  12. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    Spot on answer @lordmarcovan . I might just add that a coin regardless proof or otherwise has a higher appreciation value if they are rarer. And proofs are often rarer. Also, touching a coin is absolutely avoided for reasons as you mentioned. Not withstanding protecting coins from the elements such as tarnish, scratch, chemical reactions fro humidity or acidic sweat etc. I used to collect common circulated coins but if u think about it, they end up being on a plastic box among other junk taking space a dime by th dozen. True there might be gems in circulated coins but you have better odds at striking a lottery.

    Proof doesn't always stay proof. Depending on where u stay and where u leave them, unless airtight moisture can tarnish them. But such tarnish are numimstically acceptable as the surface remains unaffected. Proofs are notoriously sensitive to touch and fingerprints sometimes appear many many years later
     
  13. Collect89

    Collect89 Coin Collector

    I saw the business strikes at a recent coin show. The dealer said that the mint uses proprietary "pixie dust" in the coin's manufacture. :) Perhaps someone here can tell us more about this pixie dust?
     
  14. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Good point. We Americans are often insular and too forgetful of how things are in other parts of the world. There are certainly far more collectors in the so-called "developed world". I read an interesting article recently about that.

    As to how long a proof coin stays a proof, the answer is forever. Once a proof, always a proof. You see, "proof" is a method of manufacture, not a condition.

    This coin, for example, is a proof that got circulated. Its grade is PR06 - that's a 6 on the Sheldon grading scale of 1 to 70! But it's still a proof, because that refers to the way it was made, not the condition it's in. (It also happens to be a rare pattern coin, but that's beside the point.) Again, "proof" refers to how a coin was made.

    It's like the soldier metaphor I used earlier. Take that Indian cent pattern I just linked to. That particular soldier was issued wearing his finest dress uniform (in other words, the coin was issued as a proof). He did not wear his combat fatigues (in other words, this was not a regular strike designed to circulate). But he still ended up going into battle (circulation) anyway, so now his dress uniform is all worn out! But that doesn't change the fact that the coin is a proof, even though most proofs will grade over 60 on the Sheldon scale (PR63, PR65, etc.) To see a PR06 is unusual, since few proofs circulated.
     
    Kentucky, Loong Siew and pragmatic like this.
  15. pragmatic

    pragmatic Well-Known Member

    @lordmarcovan I read the article. It goes parallel to what I noticed in coin values from different countries. The article is very precise in not ignoring exceptions to the rule. A couple of weeks ago, I was purchasing some random coins from a local vendor; there was a palestinian coin within the pile of coins on tray. He tried to convince me to take it; but it was badly worn (letters wiped out). He further commented that coins from palestine are very expensive if in good shape. I thought he is bullshi**ng me till i went home and searched for coins from palestine. Surprisingly almost all palestenian items on ebay were expensive like hell. I later understood that they are very expensive because they are very rare, let alone the political background of these coins; they prove the existence of a state.for which reason local and arab collectors crave for these coins and buy them at any cost!! Here again, it seems to me "demand" is a major factor decisive of a coin value.

    As for the proof coin; if i saw that indian coin before your reply, I would have thought "wtf"! It looks more circulated than most circulated coins look.

    In Egypt, coin market is stagnant, because of inflation we are suffering from. This however hasn't changed yet the value of coins as they were used ro be. Paradoxically, with infation, the price of coins doubled and tripled.

    How long could the country and people endure inflation and economic collapse would decide how the coun marker progress or regress. It is however in the zone of the unseen.
     
    Loong Siew likes this.
  16. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    That Indian cent happens to be a pattern coin. It is an 1858 prototype of the Indian cent design that was first produced in 1859. The shield on the reverse of that is slightly different than the ones on later Indian cents. It is a rare piece, and expensive even in the (unusual) circulated grade. US patterns are frightfully expensive. French pattern coins, not so much.
     
    Loong Siew and pragmatic like this.
  17. chrisild

    chrisild Coin Collector

    Can of worms alert!! Of course the proper answer is "None". :D

    Third party grading, and then collecting those slabbed coins, is quite popular in the US. Here in Europe ... not really. And I don't think it is common elsewhere.

    Then again, it can certainly be helpful - the grading company will not only give you its opinion about the grade of a submitted coin (i.e. how well preserved it is) but you also know that your coin is authentic. And if you consider coins to be an investment, another advantage pops up: By and large, you can - at least in the US - sell such graded pieces better ($$) and more easily.

    Side note about euro collectors: We aren't really better. ;) Even people who do not care about third party grading at all may well pay more for collector coins that still come in their original packaging.

    Now people who collect current circulation coins might be more interested in the variety of themes, designs, etc. and not care that much about "micro" grading. That is especially true for collectors who would rather have one coin from each country than each and every possible year/mintmark combination of basically the same coin. The good thing is, no "camp" is better than the others here ...

    Christian
     
    Loong Siew and pragmatic like this.
  18. pragmatic

    pragmatic Well-Known Member

    Literally i am this type of collector. There are no better words to describe me than those you just summed up :D
     
    Loong Siew likes this.
  19. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    Sadly here in Malaysia where I live people are obsessed with the year of the coin and pays supreme premiums over common straits settlement silvers because of a year or mintmark. Very much like American collectors. Personally I believe the money spent is better off used to procure other coins which has a more historical or numismatic significance.
     
    chrisild and pragmatic like this.
  20. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I only had five Straits coins in the collection I built for my daughter, but I remember when I sold them, the bidding was quite active, and of course more than one of them went home to Malaysia. As I recall, the people who bought them were very excited about the fact they were slabbed.
     
    Loong Siew and pragmatic like this.
  21. Loong Siew

    Loong Siew Well-Known Member

    Honestly I believe the collectors here are just collecting out of the sport of it and for speculative purposes. They do not really subscribe to the appreciation of coins for their artistic and historical value.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page