[CLOSED] Drawing-Dalton & Hamer's Conder token tome

Whether you're new to Conder tokens or just reluctant to pony up for this reference, here's a chance to obtain an unused copy. (2004 reprint with Davisson's update material, 567 pgs.)

Drop me a note on this site by 10 am West coast time on Monday, May 11th to enter the drawing. No costs, no postage.

Bob

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I'm definitely interested. Do you want entries made on this thread or by private message?

 

If you are new to Conder tokens or a seasoned collector this is a reference work that should be in your bookcase.

 

Please enter me in the drawing.

 

This is not an entry, because I have a copy. This is an essential reference for anyone collecting this material. In addition, this is the best version available, even better than the original in my opinion.

 

Entries in this thread are fine.

Bob

PS You're in, Jersey magic man!

 

Please enter my name into this drawing. Thank you very much for the chance!

 

I'm not in need of this, but very nice of you to offer it.

 

This is the only Condor token I have. Can anyone tell me about it, besides what is says on the reverse. Actual minting year, mint (I assume the R on the obverse is a mint mark), designer, engraver, stuff like that. Looks like this piece has a planchet crack at 12;00, and the token is slightly dished. Was this produced with a rolling die (not sure that is the correct terminology) or just damaged? 

 

Part of the Middlesex-National series. It's either DH-943 or 943a depending on the edge type.

 

Mine is the plain edge, so it's 943a. Do you know which mint is represented by R?

 

That R is part of the abbreviation for October. They just used a different font for the R. Take a look at the description in the screen shot. The put it at the end of OCT.

 

And the winner of the drawing is...

Mr. Numismatist!
Please drop me a PM with your shipping info.

Thanks everyone for playing!

 

Wow, thanks!

 

Congrats! Now I know who to go to for identifying condor tokens.

 

Thanks for that explanation. Didn't even think of that.