Hello everyone! It's called "Tarnished Tuesday!". Won't you post yours as well?? I know, I know. Some of you probably hate this term in Numismatics but there is a difference between that, and "toning" as explained below>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see how I did...... Tarnishing Unattractive Uneven Fingerprints Blemishes “Milk Spots” Toning Attractive, “Eye Appeal” Nice Colors (blue, purple, rainbow) Enjoy your week all!
This one is a case of now you see it, now you don't. I bought this Didius denarius at a convention and then found it had been sold at auction the month before with this stain. The second image is how I bought it. Didius Julianus AR Denarius. Rome, AD 193. [IMP C]AES M DID [IVLIAN AVG], laureate head to right / CONCO[RD MILIT], Concordia standing facing, head to left, holding aquila and vexillum. RIC IV 1; BMCRE 2; RSC 2. 3.24g, 17mm.
I agree that there is a point where "toned" becomes too toned or as you say "tarnished". This one is close. On the other hand, here's one that simply has a spot of tarnish. I really like the coin, but that spot in front of Liberty drives me nuts.
I sold this recently. I probably would have kept it if it looked better but who wants a black silver coin? I was glad I was able to sell it honestly.
I'd say the experiment was a success, in that it did a good job of determining whether or not that agent would work!