a small example

Reminds me of detecto.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

If a person wishes to exchange any personal information voluntarily about themselves, they should do so by 'conversations' ( PM). Everyone should be cautious , as once done, it is not easily withdrawn.

 

I asked this question in an earlier post, and silent&violent scolded me by saying "it doesn't matter because his sentences are disorganized". teachmind did say he speaks Spanish, though.

 

By the way, these are some really amazing close ups. How did you accomplish this, teachmind?

 

Meaninglishness!

Chris

 

The problem with the coin shown in the OP is grinder doubling!

 

I made a lens for my smart phone I will be back in a few minutes with more images

 

remember the lines you guys say they are finger prints here are the lines i said they are not fingerprints

wait i have more of them

 

how many different eyes do you see

just wait that ones not that good

 

Excellent images! What do you think?

 

Dremel & wire brush

 

All you are showing us are a bunch of poor images of damaged coins.
You have nothing to teach anyone. You know nothing about coins.

 

I would simply rephrase that to:

"You have a LOT to Learn about Coins".

When I worked as a Technical Illustrator back in the early 70's, I was always amazed at the number of people it took to produce a simple "Data Sheet". Producing a Parts Catalog took forever!

There were the editors, the type setters, the artists, the printer, the publisher, the distributor.

Type Setters used IBM Composer Typewriters which had interchangeable fonts and the copy was typed out first in rough draft on regular paper then onto clay based paper.

The artist would cut up the final copy for placement on the page along with any required illustrations.

The Art Director would finalize the copy and send it to the printer who in turn would do his/her magic with creating negatives and plates or 4 color separation.


Virtually EVERY Single one of those processes were duplicated by Microsoft Word which enabled a single individual to create and print a data sheet.

Without a doubt, there were numerous errors which would have never escaped a professional shop but since the overhead was cheap, some of this crap was still used.

It reminded me of a saying that simply owning a hammer does not make someone a carpenter.

In todays environment, there are Smart Phones and all sorts of other "toys" which enable folks to see coins in a way in which "they've" never seen them before.
They spot what appears to be doubling and then they're off to the races!

You see, simply having or owning a tool will not get you the necessary educational background that will enable you to interpret what you are seeing.

I expect that here within the next month or so, My. @teachmind will publish some sort of a paper to document his theory on die doubling and how it comes about and how plentiful these are to the average layman.

Never mind the fact that damaged machine doubled or die deterioration doubled coins are the subject matter because his mind is made up that he's discovered something new and incredible. So incredible and simple that even the finest numismatic minds in the world have not been able to spot it!

I kind wish that he'd just puke up what all the fuss is about! But then, I expect that he's worried that he won't get credit for this "discovery" and perhaps not get his due financial rewards and/or recognition.

If I knew what the heck he was talking about, I might be able to give a credible response but all I'm seeing is some sort of childish game which, based upon the photography, which is ok, appears to address die deterioration doubling combined with machine doubling.

Owning a Macro Lens for an IPhone with the ability to publish close up photographs, does not make someone a die attributor just like owning a hammer does not make someone a carpenter.

He's not the first and he certainly will not be the last.

 

i dont know what the hell is going on with some of you. i have not used no dam wire brush or anything else. i do not own an i phone i made a lens for my girlfrend phone it not mine sorry for that lie. thank you all for everything and all the laughing lol. all what you guys say thats what drives me to push harder even when i feel like quiting. i am going to do this right not the way you guys want me to.

the next time i post an image it will be something and i know how simple you guys want it. so it makes it harder for me to get what you want or need so you wont have to think and figure it out of what i am saying. i am not looking to argue it just seems i have to keep saying it over and over so you guys wont think i am gone and just jokeing around..please dont put anything about what i just said please its enough already. i wish i could show you everthing i know but i cant this is the best i can do for now.
i do feel i am getting close when i see it then i will know what i am doing then you will know. please dont ask.

heres a picture of my lens

i heated to shape the shape of the phone after making the hole for the lens and cut a door for the flash it opens and closes for more or less light and the rubber band holds it on tight. the lenses are from two different things ones a scope for a rifle the other lens is from a re writible dvd drive it was 22X i did not use the tiny laser lens its the one under it.

 

OMG...crop circles

 

Photo harvested, thank you!

Actually, THIS is exactly what I said:

I wasn't scolding you as much as inviting this person to make his own excuses. I have not seen any attempt by him to improve or assist our understanding by informing the group of any impediment.
Language need not be an impediment on an internet forum.

I'll thank you to at least tag me in the future if you want to misquote me and put words in my mouth. Or better yet, quote directly as I have here to avoid future misunderstandings.

I stand by my previous statement.

There is no excuse or use for mush mouth on the internet. Vernacular is perfectly acceptable, but the op does not write in vernacular. More like jibberish.

 

Oops, sorry. I am glad to know we now have it correct. Ha, ha! I may add, teachmind obviously has some type of disability, maybe we can be more respectable of that, and let the moderators decide. After all, it's their site!

 

So it's harvested. Who cares?
Do you realize that it wasn't aimed at you?