Now that makes sense if you are suggesting rough spots are the result of plating over rust.
They certainly do fit the criteria of being "too shiny". I read that the proof is in the edges, as the edges shouldn't be plated.
I wont argue that. haha the story certainly doesn't add up. But I still want to know what happened to these coins.
T he cardboard holder was a pointless detail. Obviously somebody the coins in it at some point. I never assumed it came from the mint. I don't...
I never said when I got the coins, or when the antique dealer got them. I don't know where you got those dates from. To be honest, I have no...
Also, there is no rust, nor corrosion on these coins.
Keep in mind I had a coin dealer look at them. He said they looked BU to him and certainly made no mention of reprocessing.
Well considering the story, none of these features should match listings. So far I have never seen an equal.
Oh I almost forgot to mention. I see some good sales going around for double stamped mint marks for denver. If that coin is becoming sought after...
Either way, I still want to know what these errors or damages are. Maybe my post wasn't clear enough on that.
I have read about the signs of reprocessing. These coins do not exhibit those signs. They do not all have the same shine. And what does "IMHO"...
We still do not know if they were reprocessed. And how would we?
This thread has two intentions. One, to find out if and what errors these coins have. The other intention is to just share my story, which I have...
Separate names with a comma.
