"lordmarcovan" Wrote : Wow, cette siliqua est vraiment charmante. [IMG] Did you see the fault in the observ'legend ? Thas why the price is so high
New research : [IMG]
Hello friends collectors of old coins! I am writing an article on a particular siliqua struck by the Antioch mint for Valens during its...
This one was prepared by a professional that I found in France. NotInRic, it was very important to put the 3 pieces in one! ! CONSTANT - SISCIA...
HONORIUS - RAVENNE - RIC X Imitation [IMG] Crédit photo : ©Siliquae Silique, 440-440, Imitation A/ D N HONORI-VS P F AVG Dominus Noster Honorius...
HONORIUS - Silique - 1228e [IMG] ------------------------------ HONORIUS - Silique - 1228e [IMG] ------------------------------ HONORIUS -...
ARCADIUS - 1/2 silique - 1235 [IMG] ------------------------------ HONORIUS - Silique - [IMG] ------------------------------ HONORIUS -...
ARCADIUS - Silique - 013 [IMG] ------------------------------ ARCADIUS - Silique - 013 [IMG] ------------------------------ ARCADIUS -...
THIS IS THE SILIQUA OF MEDIOLANUM OF MY DATABASIS (www.siliques.fr) : VALENTINIEN II - Silique - [IMG] ------------------------------...
This is NOTINRIC, because a star in the somital (RIC 35-V). There is another one NotInRic of this #ref because a diadem in D4 in place of D3. [IMG]
In fact : SISCPZ A dot in the sommital (not a star or a chi-ro) So #ref change as RIC IX Siscia 25 RSC 72
Because the 1,77 g, it's not RIC 102 (355-358) but a RIC 133, RSC 342-3v (358-361).
In fact, the mintmark is with a dot: SIRM• And the date is not "357-361 AD" but 351-355 (heavy siliqua, so before the change of 358). Date:...
Separate names with a comma.
