I'll guess MS62 but I'm not sure on that. Nice looking coin regardless of the grade!
Another vote for @Tall Paul here! Good luck, that's a nice looking token!
63, because of the right field by the hair. Is the reverse scratched?
Technically, they do. Supposedly, they (CACG) grade coins at the same standard that warrants a green (CAC) Bean. That's why every coin they (CACG)...
Yeah, weight is 26.275g. I've had some Morgans in that territory before but they were worn down a heck of a lot more than this one.
I didn't purchase this, it's just on loan to me from the owner to see if I could find markers for any VAM. Alas, I've hit a wall. And yeah, it...
I'm not sure how to physically verify that, but they seem like the typical depth. I tried looking at the hair D, eye, inner ear, inside the bow...
I'm fairly sure this is not legit, but I wanted to get more eyes on it before I return it to its owner. 1887 (P) Morgan, double struck, seemingly...
I was coming here to say this is definitely not 1872, but 1878. Glad to see others have already figured it out, but just to reaffirm the masses, I...
VF35, judging by the coinfact images. I'm really not overly experienced in grading these fellas, so seeing the Photograde slide bar helped me choose.
I'll still get some more pictures for you! Just running around like a chicken without a head for a bit recently. I'll be getting my new laptop in...
Without getting it out for more pics (currently putting some finishing touches on ribs for dinner) here's a screenshot zoomed in at the first...
I'm all ears! I haven't given much thought to figuring out the variety for that one.
I did end up going back and getting that! This is after an acetone bath. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] I don't...
Separate names with a comma.
