(1) Look at a lot of grade MS65 dollars, of the same date and mint mark. Pick a common one if you just want it as a type coin. (1881-S is an...
They were produced in early [Feb?] 1965 using unused 1964 dies. They were die trials for replacing the proof sets. 2 to 3 dozen sets were...
I had the cent (PCGS 65) and the quarter (PCGS 64) but have since sold them. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
I am inclined toward MS63+, maybe a 64 on a good day. This date is nearly always well struck and there are a lot of very nice specimens in gem or...
Been on the dealer side of the table for 13 years now and need to get to the other side and back to the stuff I am actually good at doing. (Never...
AU58 Details
Seller needs to understand what VAMs are and learn how to approach attributing them, by confirmation and elimination.
MS65+, limited by the long scratch on the cheek/chin and those above the reverse motto.
It should grade MS60 or MS61. Outside chance of AU58 if wear is found. A couple spots could be taken as scratched on a coin that was less baggy....
PCGS labels all 12 and 12A as simply 12. 12A is post-clash and is vastly more common than the pre-clash 12. The rarity under the radar is the...
That die pair/state often comes prooflike. The clash remediation repolishing by the jaw/neck junction should not preclude the designation. Don't...
Congrats on that one. I know years back finding that obverse was alarming because it was interesting and not immediately recalled as being...
Still a lot cheaper than it was in the early days of CAC.
Nice coin for the grade, which is what I guessed it would be, though hard to discern PL from DMPL in internet images. The surfaces were to...
Separate names with a comma.
