This was answered 12 years ago. It's not a coin, a medal or a token. It is a decoration that was attached to a belt or purse made in the 1960s...
It is still post mint damage. There is no term post mint error. These coins have no additional value.
I lean toward the improper annealing scenario . I guess I should have adde that:-)
tough to be sure from this image but it has a better than 50% chance that it is. I lean toward the possibility as it looks right when I magnify...
It could be. It could also be interestingly toned.
It's a very slight misaligned die strike. It is so slight as to be worth only face value. It is not an off center strike.
I've seen many of these with a large number dated 1955 and later. They used to be called "cracked skull" errors by some and traded back in the...
the images look like two coins. the one is a blank planchet and the other is a damaged canadian cent.
it's probably been answere somewhere in the 5 pages, but it has been heavily plated. It's not an error.
No conjecture. The S is effected by machine doubling plus the effects of die deterioration. The surface of the coin shows the ripply, "orange...
i think it has a chance at being an RPD. Not 100% sure but it could be. Keep in mind that the CPG does not show every known possibility. Take...
definitely an acid bath. no question about it.
Nice!! It's been 15 years since I've found one.
i lean toward die deterioration and then an acid dip. Coins that have been damaged turn up in bank rolls all the time.
die deterioration....sorry about the typo
Separate names with a comma.
