He has already brought politics up in this very thread. Dan Carr's detractors are not only as he described, but rather, I'm sure, on both sides of...
Are you just trying to get banned from yet another coin forum?
Pretty coin but I'll say no CAC.
We get it, you do not like CAC.
Bean on the commemorative, assuming the luster is there. Original as you can get, JA loves originality on coins.
I thought the spot would doom it for sure as did others here, but it did CAC. The spot still bothers me, and I will eventually replace it. [IMG]
Ok, ok, twist my arm, I will do another! This one should be challenging. 1880-S, NGC MS66 PL. [IMG] [IMG]
Thanks! I have a nicer '79-S too! Not color-wise but overall, in my opinion. I say the Franklin did not bean. JA does not like fingerprints.
I think my post disappeared. Here is the Morgan. I completely agree with the sticker here. A lovely coin plus an OGH. [IMG] @Lehigh96 You are up!
I will wrap this one up early since nobody has gotten it right, and I doubt anybody will. Gold CAC and very deserving, in-hand. [IMG] Up next...
The market pays a premium, therefore I submit, personally. I have also learned a LOT from chatting with him about US type and the stuff I submit....
To be honest, I have several coins that have failed CAC that I think deserve stickers. I do not let it bother me at this point, I have accepted...
It is fine. A touch of haze but nothing substantial. As I mentioned, JA specifically outlined "Cheek Scratches" as why he didn't bean it but I do...
Sorry, my wife made snow crab legs for dinner and I got distracted. The 1880-O did NOT bean. :( John Albanese said there is a touch too much...
I will post the reveal as well as another right around 6pm Eastern. :)
Separate names with a comma.
