Same thing goes to say why dont I let the world know what I have in my collection?I guess when they are ready they will and I understand...
I was simply stating the most likely cause of the missing metal,not renaming a new coin diagnosis.Has anybody on this site tried being friendly to...
That is a Lamination Pull Off.Pull off is different from a peel.The layer was removed by the die(pull Off)
Have you considered submitting this to PCGS for a swap out?There is only slight bubble out in the SE part of the rim and PCGS might do you one...
That coin was dipped or sprayed.Spraying is the newest thing going.I throw out a professional secret to you in saying that true luster does not...
Yes a few did slip out the door,but more were given out for approval and they can be legally owned.To tell you the truth there is not a Treasury...
The 33 was a regular issue that was recalled before any left the mint,so the ones that are in private posession were smuggled and liable to...
A brilliant thumbs up to you.Smuggling is stealing and would legislate confiscation.The coins given out to the legislative body for approval are...
To own NO.To use as Legal Tender...
Dont want it to spread too far but I am a Treasury #%&#@ and I know its hard to believe but as was the 1856 FE handed out as an example for a vote...
Worked NGC for 3 years.Pretty much Ive come adapt to it.The high points and low points should never have similar handling marks.This coin does.In...
I was an Authenticator for NGC Parsippany for 3 years and I currently work for the Treasury.
With its many previous cleanings and scattered marks it would net VG-8 w/fine detail
Coin is a 63 cleaned.Uncertifiable.
The coin would not be confiscated because it was not used in the consumer market.The coin itself If kept as a collectible and not used to pay for...
Separate names with a comma.
