The buyer is definitely the seller. Look at the winning bid code: s***w(582feedback score: 582) And the sellers name: moralesw1239 (582 )
Not sure what you mean. That's not what happened. He bought the coin and then listed it for sale at a higher price.
Yes, because the coin was sold, that's why I included the pics. The links were posted back in August! Better luck next time!
I am with others, the coin simply depicts an attractive woman much as in most ancient art. Artfully depicted women top less do not constitute porn to me. Actually, I have always been confused why women are forbidden in this country to go top less. Must be a puritan thing. Most of the rest of the world is not so uptight about it. To me, to be porn, it must graphically show below the waist in an inartistic fashion. Unless you are a 12 year old and giggle looking at statues in the Louvre, I do not see how you can consider this item pornographic.
I agree, the women depicted on the coin is not porn. Yes, she's a bit chesty but definitely, not porn. Porn definition: Sometimes por·no [pawr-noh] . pornography; sexually explicit videos, photographs, writings, or the like, produced to elicit sexual arousal (often used attributively):arrested for selling porn;a porn star;porn films. television shows, articles, photographs, etc., thought to cater to an excessive, irresistible desire for or interest in something:a magazine filled with enticing food porn; an addiction to real-estate porn.
". . . In 1964, Justice Potter Stewart tried to explain "hard-core" pornography, or what is obscene, by saying, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced... ut I know it when I see it ..."