do you believe that this coin has been in a private collection for 2500 years? MACEDON NEAPOLIS Silver Drachm. Circa 360 BC 16 mm. 3,85 g. Obv: Facing gorgoneion with protruding tongue. Rev: N-E-O-Π; Head of Nymph right, hair rolled on forehead; small bird to right in right field. SNG ANS 428 (same dies); De Luynes 1521 (same reverse die). Extremely fine with a beautiful collection toning. Very rare variant
I believe I read on here a while back that there are no known private collections that go back further than the 1400s. Though, to answer your question, even if I hadn't read that, no I wouldn't believe it.
Because there were no collectors that long ago. So what is the provenance of your coin? How far back did you actually trace it? Are those pimples on the ANS coin?
Anyone claiming that a coin has been in a private collection or collections continuously since ancient times (let alone 2,000+ years) is basically attempting to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge. Or the Acropolis. There isn't one single ancient coin known to have been above ground continuously since ancient Greek or Roman times (not even at the Vatican); they were all dug up at some point. Don't forget that despite various claims to the contrary, there are exactly zero families that can legitimately trace their ancestry back to ancient Rome or Greece with documentary proof -- let alone any family heirlooms or other possessions of any such families. The furthest back anyone of European descent can prove their ancestry continuously (without any fabrications or conveniently glossed-over missing links in the chain) is to three or four generations beyond Charlemagne. See https://www.geni.com/projects/Ancestors-of-Charlemagne/4914, explaining:
That theory doesn't account for populations (such as certain indigenous peoples in South America, Indonesia, etc.) that have been isolated and/or endogamous for at least that long and have no European admixture whatsoever. The most recent common ancestor of all people today lived a very, very long time ago.
I am very interested in where this coin was lying for 2500 years and preserved so well. Perhaps she is from the treasure? This coin is currently on sale at the Lanz auction for 4000 Euros .... and above ... But in any case, I have many questions about its safety ... https://www.ebay.de/itm/LANZ-MACEDO...459592?hash=item56dfb66348:g:x0cAAOSwBHlfFKlZ
Seems impossible for the reasons enumerated above. My traceable genealogy only goes back to the 1600's, though my surname (when Latinized) is the name of a barbarian tribe that provided troops to the Empire in the late 4th century as mentioned in the Notitia Dignitatum and also by the historian Ammianus Marcellinus, however there is a 1300 year gap. The name of the tribe also was mentioned in the writings of St. Jerome dating back to the 5th century.
I don't see anyplace at this link where it's claimed that the coin has been in a collection continuously for 2,000+ years. Or are you suggesting that the only possible way the coin could look like this -- namely, as if it were struck last week! -- would be if it had actually been preserved in a collection continuously since its manufacture? In other words, given the impossibility of such a history, are you really implying that the coin, despite its impressive provenance, is a fake? (I admit that even though this coin is not from Apollonia Pontika, I've recently looked at so many real and fake gorgons from that town that there's something about the gorgon on this coin that looks suspicious to me. Perhaps that it's too perfect?)
Yes, either this coin has been kept in a hermetically sealed safe for 2500 years. It was later found by chance in the ground inside this safe and there were many such coins and it was a hidden treasure that was secretly found in the 17th or 19th century. Either it is a fake, and, possibly, the old type of the Renaissance period of the 15th or 16th or 17th centuries. Or it’s a fake of our time. This coin for antiquity is too perfect in its appearance. My suspicion is that during antiquity there was no technology to create such perfect coins. And in this you are right.
Have you seen a Syracusan dekadrachm? Perfection (or at least perceived perfection) is no reason to doubt the authenticity of an ancient coin. There were many talented celators that produced coins of remarkable artistry.
I believe in the authenticity of this coin, it has an archaic style: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=316435 https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?similar=316435 This one is almost the same: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=260813 And the woman's head on the Lantz coin is not archaic!!!!!!!!!
Maybe, but it turns out that this coin was not in circulation. It was minted and immediately hidden in a hermetic safe for 2500 years. Found only now.