Post your Lincolns!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by New Gen. Nick, Oct 4, 2011.

?

Do you like the new pennies?

  1. OH YEAH BABY.

    31.8%
  2. ew no.

    68.2%
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Bob’s coin might have gotten an MS70 net grade. Typically PCGS details grades bright blue copper because of its association with MS70 but maybe they were on the fence regarding the originality of the color and decided to net grade the coin instead of details grading it.

    The other issue is that we are looking at a TruView. Does the TruView give an accurate depiction of the coin in hand or is it a glamour shot. @robec is one of the best photographers out there, I’d like to see his own photos of this coin.
     
    RonSanderson likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    Those are two excellent points and I had not thought of either of them. Thanks for giving me some more ideas to think about.

    Ron
     
  4. robec

    robec Junior Member

    That is my photo. Here is the TrueView. WingedLiberty designer my template. I do use the same font as PCGS for the Cert Number, which is a public font.
    [​IMG]

    Here are my other obverse photos

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2019
    BadThad likes this.
  5. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    OMG, it totally fooled me, I thought it was the TruView, lol.

    That said, your photo shows more luster, but my guess is that the blue color is not as prominent in hand unless blasted with light, correct me if I’m wrong.

    What do you think about the possibility of a net grade for being exposed to MS70?

    Btw, regardless of grade, the coin is tremendous and I love it!
     
  6. robec

    robec Junior Member

    I added the 7 obverse photos to my post above yours.
    I do agree with you on the net grade possibility.
    I bought the coin 6 years ago for $23. At the time it was in an NGC MS62BN holder.
    Not that it makes a difference, but here is a slab shot just now taken with my phone. And it does glow when the light hits it.

    [​IMG]
     
    DBDc80, BadThad and Evan8 like this.
  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    That’s like coin porn, feel free to post that many photos of your incredible coins anytime you want!
     
  8. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    While we're back in the 1920's, I just took new photos of this one.

    I am very curious about estimates for the grade. I bought this for $90 from a well-known seller's online "Bargain Bin" as soon as they revealed that feature on their website.

    I just want to get some verification or refutation to my fantasy that this is actually a very nice coin. As a bonus, here's a link to a Heritage auction of an MS65.

    01c 1926-S #04 full 01v.gif

    Previously posted a couple years back in post #20904.
     
    BadThad, Evan8 and robec like this.
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Wow, that’s incredible, even more blue than the closeups. Out of curiosity, what is price guide on a 1929 MS63 BN?
     
  10. robec

    robec Junior Member

    It's rare to see a 1926-S with that much detail, especially on the obverse. That is a super coin. The detail is 65 for sure, but as with my blue 1929, this might get net graded because of color. Not that it's wild, but the TPG's are very inconsistent when it comes to color.

    Yours makes my 63BN look like a 40, with exception to the luster. Of course different dies were used for both coins.

    [​IMG]
     
    BadThad, Evan8 and RonSanderson like this.
  11. robec

    robec Junior Member

    $20
     
  12. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    Your photos s were too tempting not to try some automation. I know I could do better if I really got fanatic about aligning, cropping, and ordering them in the best sequence. But, what the heck!

    1929Linc_MS63BNo_01.gif
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2019
    Lehigh96, BadThad and robec like this.
  13. robec

    robec Junior Member

    That's great! Nice job getting them all lined up. It probably isn't as smooth as yours because each of my shots has the coin and lighting in different positions.
     
  14. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

  15. Kentucky

    Kentucky Well-Known Member

    BadThad likes this.
  16. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    New photos of this 1951 cent, previously shown in a couple of not-so-great photos in posts #4211 and #4213. These are better.

    01c 1951 full 01.gif

    The 1951-D and -S were also shown back then, in post #4412.

    01c 1951-D full 01.gif
    01c 1951-S full 01.gif
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2019
    PBOYCOIN, BadThad and robec like this.
  17. PBOYCOIN

    PBOYCOIN Member

  18. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    Islander80-83 and robec like this.
  19. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    These photos replace a couple of earlier attempts. Probably in a few years I will have another new approach and replace this one.

    01c 1954 full 01.gif
     
    Islander80-83, BadThad and robec like this.
  20. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    A humble but quite original coin. Yes, I like the gunk in the devices....that's how it should look.

    1928D_1119.jpg 1928D_1119rev.jpg
     
    Islander80-83 and robec like this.
  21. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page