How many coins have you submitted for grading this year (2019)?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Oct 1, 2019.

?

How many coins have you submitted for grading this year (2019)?

  1. 0

  2. 1-10

  3. 11-20

  4. 21-30

  5. 31-40

  6. 41-50

  7. 51-75

  8. 76-100

  9. More than 100

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I just sent my second submission of the year to NGC for grading and was wondering how many coins our other Cointalk members have submitted for grading this year. Please vote in the attached poll.

    Personally, I have submitted 73 coins this year, although two of the coins are just for re-holdering. If you are actively submitting coins, please tell us how many you have submitted and which grading service you use.

    Thank you,
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Wow 73 is alot!
    I submitted just 5 for mint error attribution and 1 for re-holdering.
     
  4. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Just 5 pieces...US Gold:cat:
     
  5. onecenter

    onecenter Member

    Zippo, and never will.
     
  6. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    Well, there's the 8 for the collector's club, then several silver dollars that I send with bulk orders over the course of the year, and I think another few, so I put down 21-30. They all go to PCGS.
     
  7. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    Same as last year...and the year before...and the three decades before that. Same number that I will submit next year.

    I have, however, UNSUBMITED several this year...and the year before...and the three decades before that.
     
  8. BuffaloHunter

    BuffaloHunter Short of a full herd Supporter

    It's been a number of years since I've submitted anything. Was pretty active sending coins to NGC from about 2003 - 2011, but even then it was less than 25 per year. Currently I have nothing raw that's worthy of a submission.
     
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Best of luck!

    I think I'll be in the 11-20 bracket, like most years.

    I do have another PCGS submission pending (@kazuma78 will be piggybacking with me, and recently reminded me I need to get crackin' on that, since I have his coins in my safe deposit box!)

    Have not done any NGC submissions this year, and don't, much, since I use them only for ancients, but I will be sending 3-4 ancients their way soon. This summer I had decided to crack out my ancients and keep them raw, but have weaseled out reconsidered and will double down instead, continuing my controversial* decision to keep them in plastic coffins. I only got as far as cracking out one, which was in a defective slab anyway.

    (*Ancient coin people hate slabs. Just mention the despised sl*b word over on the Ancients forum and see what happens. No, really- Don't.) ;)

    Here are the "keepers" from this year so far. (Clickable TrueViews)

    (The Reigate Hoard pedigree was not put on the label by PCGS, but the coin went XF45, so I'm pleased.)[​IMG]

    (Lizzie came out VF35, exactly as expected and hoped. TrueViews look good, though I've found CNG's images are often as good or better.)
    [​IMG]

    (1682 Johanna shipwreck pedigree was put on label by PCGS. Ex- @Paddy54 , as was the Reigate Hoard groat above.)
    [​IMG]

    (Pop 1/0 and top-pop simply by virtue of being the only one ever submitted. I like the other picture better than the TrueView, which is a bit dark.)
    [​IMG]

    (Nice straight crossover from ANACS F15 but the TrueViews look awful and exaggerate the microporosity on the reverse)
    [​IMG]

    (Cracked from an NGC MS62 holder and went MS62+ at PCGS. The TrueView was a home run this time.)
    [​IMG]

    (Another of these Esperanto pieces went MS65. I kept this one, which made MS66 and is now the top-pop example. Of course there are only 3 in all grades.)
    [​IMG]

    (Also top-pop, but not hard to do, since it seems I'm the only person who's ever submitted one. Just a $3-ish coin I kept for sentimental reasons, and liked so much that I spent $50-ish to slab it.)
    [​IMG]

    (Made my first 70 with this one- PR70 DCAM- and deservedly so. I got it in the original Austrian mint capsule. The TrueViews underplay the impressive, caked-on frost and blazing mirrors this coin has. Pop. 1/0 and top-pop, but again only by virtue of being the only one ever submitted.)
    [​IMG]
     
    KSorbo, dwhiz, TypeCoin971793 and 8 others like this.
  10. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    +1
     
  11. Prez2

    Prez2 Well-Known Member

    Never submitted any on my own. Too cheap.
     
  12. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Zero. I plan to keep it that way too. I have 3 graded coins: 2 were free from PCGS and 1 was given to me in a trade.

    I've done enough learning/studying/research/whatever you want to call it, to be able to fairly and accurately grade coins myself. I don't need to pay someone a ridiculous amount of money to do what I can do and then toss it in a cheap piece of plastic.

    Eff TPGs.
     
    onecenter, Alegandron and Inspector43 like this.
  13. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    Me too. I don't care if a coin is 55 or 65 if I like the looks and it fits into my collection.
     
    Alegandron and furryfrog02 like this.
  14. Prez2

    Prez2 Well-Known Member

    I'd like to have all my coins slabbed just for established value's sake but would never pay to do it.
     
  15. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I strongly believe my coins are all worth the extra “ridiculous” amount of money. I get decent pictures, a professional opinion on grade/authenticity and variety attribution. E.g. NGC provides valuable resources such as price guide, consensus and coin explorer and they have scratch-free edge-view holders too :)
     
  16. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    There is no such thing as "established value". It is dependent on the market. You may pay $35 (on the low end) to slab a coin and the "established value" may be $50. That being said, you may never sell that coin for more than $35.
     
  17. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    None.

    I buy the coins in the holders that I want. When I was dealer, I submitted quite a few coins because it was the way to make money. Now that I am “a civilian,” the dealers try to shortchange me when I offer coins to them, so I don’t play the game. I’ll have to start taking tables again to make the buying and selling game work. The value of your inventory goes up when the dealers come to you.
     
    Paul M. and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  18. Prez2

    Prez2 Well-Known Member

    True however now there's an 'established' reference point.
     
  19. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    I have learned enough to have an opinion on grade/authenticity & variety myself. I can take decent pictures with my phone (and could do better if I chose to invest a bit more in a better set up). The price guide is free and I don't need the plastic holder to protect my coins.
     
  20. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    "established" is only what people are currently paying. Better to check recent actual sales than to go off what some TPG says the coin should be worth.
     
  21. Prez2

    Prez2 Well-Known Member

    Again true. I was just saying that now a firm grade in order to reference market price (or whatever price) that exists.
     
    furryfrog02 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page