My latest Daniel Carr fantasy issue.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Oct 26, 2016.

  1. dcarr

    dcarr Mint-Master

    A lot of the coins I over-strike are 1921. But not all.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dcarr

    dcarr Mint-Master

    There were some that were struck extra times to overcome deficiencies of the rim. That can result in "ghosting" of the "1964" date digits.
     
    Ike Skywalker and Morgandude11 like this.
  4. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Non-VAM 1921's or any date Morgans still have collector value.
     
  5. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I Like the ghosting. It creates a VAM effect amongst your Morgan restrikes--a definite unique quality right there. Definitely approve, and eagerly waiting for my '64 D restrike.
     
    Dave Waterstraat likes this.
  6. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    Dan- Is there any possibility of a 1979 Ike in the future?

    [​IMG]
     
  7. talkcoin

    talkcoin Well-Known Member

    How about a 1921 O Dan?
     
  8. Andy Herkimer

    Andy Herkimer Active Member

    You are going to start a firestorm with that one lol! I would doubt it because they did produce 1921 morgans.
     
  9. Heater

    Heater Well-Known Member

    El Cheapo is great but geeze. Leave the man alone. If you don't like don't buy. A few common date Morgan's over struck certainly isn't going to effect you or the hobby.

    Let the OP and other purchasers' enjoy.
     
  10. Heater

    Heater Well-Known Member

    Yes, please Mr Carr.
     
  11. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    And if you do please make it a peg leg. ;)
     
  12. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    How exactly did my comment give you the impression that was harassing Dan? And yes, destroying common date collectible Morgans does affect the hobby, IMO.
     
  13. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    So do my 5 pocket pieces. They are worn well beyond what they were a couple of years ago. ;)
     
  14. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Lowballs can be worth a lot of money! ;)
     
  15. Heater

    Heater Well-Known Member

    Destroying common date collectible Morgans? Sounds like a dig to me.

    I have a BU 21 Morgan bought about 40 years ago for like 3-5 bucks. A dealer will still offer me right around melt for it. So how is an over strike of a common date hurting the hobby? What are we talking about, a few hundred coins at most that will end up in the melting pot if silver soars or coins that a dealer will not pay much above melt for if offered for sale to them.
     
  16. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    So are Dan Carr overstrikes ;)
     
    Heater likes this.
  17. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    If your dealer only wants to pay melt for a BU 1921, then you need a new dealer. $14? What a great guy!
     
  18. Heater

    Heater Well-Known Member

    Actually my dealer is good....I was talking in general.

    Sells me junk silver at or below melt when I purchase. Of course one hand always washes the other & I have sold him hot mint issues at mint cost more then once.

    I am in my 50's and have been going there since I was 14, 15?
     
  19. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    You're argument is flawed CBD. Do yourself a favor and grab some high quality DC Morgans at issue price of $115 while you can. You can flip them right now for over $225-300 on the bay ;)
     
  20. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I guess this is a fair analogy. For the longest time I didn't understand paying huge money for P-01 coins. Just like I didn't understand paying $450 for a 1964-D Dan Carr token.
     
  21. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I am a fan of making money. But I have scruples. Lol
     
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page