New Photos - Still Improving

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Ancientnoob, Feb 26, 2016.

  1. Ancientnoob

    Ancientnoob Money Changer

    Please post your recent reshoots.

    Java, Bali and the Eastern Archipelago
    Kalasan or Kelurak (Empire of the Sailendra)
    AR Masa 11 mm x 2.32 grams
    Struck 778-782 AD.
    Obverse: MA (Massa) - Early Nagari Script
    Reverse: Irregular Sandalwood Flower place in Incuse square

    Old photo
    [​IMG]

    New Photo
    javanew.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    The new image is better in some aspects, but the first shows the depth on the reverse better I think. That is, it depends on what is incuse and what is not.
     
  4. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    To my eye, lighting the reverse from the bottom makes the incuse areas look raised. I believe just rotating the reverse image 180 degrees would fix that.
     
  5. Ancientnoob

    Ancientnoob Money Changer

    @Bing @dougsmit Hows this? Rotated reverse image no change otherwise. javanew.jpg
     
    dlhill132, Bing, Cucumbor and 2 others like this.
  6. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Much better!
     
  7. Cucumbor

    Cucumbor Well-Known Member

    Just a little bit to dark to my eyes, otherwise quite a nice reshoot

    Q
     
    TIF likes this.
  8. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    Hey, I saw what you did there, Noob ... you merely spun the reverse-photo rather than spinning the coin and taking another photo (very clever, my Noobish friend) ...

    Man, it's funny how merely spinning the photo 180 degrees can change the optical illusion, eh?


    noob trick too.jpg
    noob trick.jpg


    :rolleyes:
     
  9. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    Overall, I like the new images better but they are too dark. Just a bit of lightening would help quite a bit :).
     
  10. Jwt708

    Jwt708 Well-Known Member

    Don't worry @Ancientnoob I'll chime in later with some of mine.
     
  11. Cucumbor

    Cucumbor Well-Known Member

    I think I'd prefer it that way (just played a bit on the light and contrast)

    noob trick-1.jpg

    Q
     
  12. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I think turning it like you did playing and with the light the way Cucumber did makes it much better.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2016
    Ancientnoob and Cucumbor like this.
  13. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Coins without an obvious 'up' are easy to fool the brain into misinterpreting raised from recessed. When there is a recognizable subject, we see what we expect from that subject but without that clue we have to make assumptions of what we should see. The reverse was shot as it now sits with light coming from the top.

    If there were one thing I wish coin photographers would stop doing it is sending light in from the bottom. Ghoul lighting never looks natural. I this case, the coin was shot properly but just spun the wrong way so it was easier to fix.
     
  14. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Also, more coins shown here on CT appear a bit dark on my computers. I know there are variations in equipment. There are many online sites on adjusting equipment. The point here is you should see all the bars both black and white in the chart but that the last couple on both ends should be very slightly different. Many people are a great deal more into this than I am and adjust for each color separately even using a meter that reads from your screen. I am an amateur photographer and computer user who spend very little effort on such things.
    [​IMG]
     
  15. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    I have one coin whose obverse I purposefully lit from below in order to emphasize the ghoulishness. Admittedly though, I really should reshoot it.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    TIF: I like it the way it is!
     
    TIF likes this.
  17. zumbly

    zumbly Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana

    I'd reshoot it but keep this version for Halloween posts. :vamp:

    That said, however you choose to shoot it, I like this coin so much it's not even funny.
     
    TIF and stevex6 like this.
  18. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    TIF => your coin is shot as if it was a co-star in The Blair Witch Project

    [​IMG]
     
  19. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    You guys are right-- I'll keep it as it is. The uplighting seems appropriate and it really did bring out the details better than traditional lighting :).
     
    Alegandron and stevex6 like this.
  20. Lawrence Chard

    Lawrence Chard Junior Member

    The best lighting for almost all coins is a macro ringflash, and we would recommend the Canon versions, although these are made to work with Canon EOS system cameras and lenses.
    Nikon, and "other" afficionados will probably want to disagree, but about 10 years ago we junked our Nikon / Fuji equipment and replaced it with Canon because some of the Nikon stuff was incompatible with other Nikon stuff. Some online research found that the only major digital camera brand with a compatible macro system was Canon.
    We have taken about 20,000 numismatic photos, many of which will be familiar as, despite being copyright, they get "stolen" and copied by many other dealers.
     
    stevex6 likes this.
  21. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    @dougsmit, perhaps the best photographer on the Ancients side of CoinTalk, recently acquired a ring light and offered up images for our opinions. For the unique challenges of ancients coins, the ring light alone was not a magic bullet.

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-new-toy-for-photographing-coins.259886/#post-2088918

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/photo-opinions-solicited.265760/

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/new-coin-photo.262423/#post-2130687

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/rediscovery.264925/page-8#post-2193464
     
    Alegandron and Ancientnoob like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page